Testofskill's Signature Gallery

The_Hushed_Casket · Post by **The_Hushed_Casket** » Sat Jun 17, 2006 7:55 pm

Current it.

testofskill · Post by **testofskill** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 10:15 pm

One more

the reason why there is two of the renders, is because it is supposed to resemble an army

Dr.Cox · Post by **Dr.Cox** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 10:18 pm

well in my Opinion.. it dosent acheive that effect

wes · Post by **wes** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 10:24 pm

there should have been more renders if you wanted to resemble an army

testofskill · Post by **testofskill** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 10:25 pm

ok but what do you think

wes · Post by **wes** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:47 pm

i think the blurred render on the right just messes up the sig

McFarlane · Post by **McFarlane** » Tue Jun 20, 2006 3:03 am

When something is blurred, they normally do it for the render itself.
Coloring, or to smooth a rough spot.

gh0570fchurch · Post by **gh0570fchurch** » Tue Jun 20, 2006 4:10 pm

yeah take out the blurry one, then see how it will look (i cant tell you if that will look good or not, since that currently takes up a good portion of the sig).

Patrickssj6 · Post by **Patrickssj6** » Tue Jun 20, 2006 4:51 pm

Use common sense.If he is blurry it means he is either behind or infront of the other guy.Since this should represent an army he is behind the other guy.Now what is wrong?The view of perspective:

The other guy has to be smaller...not bigger(well it seems like it)

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Tue Jun 20, 2006 5:11 pm

It doesnt look like an army, more like the Mutated Siamese twin thats gonna shrivel off.

gh0570fchurch · Post by **gh0570fchurch** » Tue Jun 20, 2006 6:29 pm

Patrickssj6 wrote:The other guy has to be smaller...not bigger(well it seems like it)

thats the main reason why it doesnt look believable.

testofskill · Post by **testofskill** » Sun Jun 25, 2006 1:31 pm

New one

Grunt Rebel · Post by **Grunt Rebel** » Sun Jun 25, 2006 3:07 pm

I like it. Not sure what i like but it looks good to me.

testofskill · Post by **testofskill** » Sun Jun 25, 2006 5:15 pm

ok heres one more, it also took me hours

Grunt Rebel · Post by **Grunt Rebel** » Sun Jun 25, 2006 5:22 pm

I dont like it... to advanced for me.

testofskill · Post by **testofskill** » Sun Jun 25, 2006 5:23 pm

haha

i know, it is just too professional

wes · Post by **wes** » Sun Jun 25, 2006 5:32 pm

hours?
i can make that in minutes

testofskill · Post by **testofskill** » Sun Jun 25, 2006 8:57 pm

ok heres an animated one

Dr.Cox · Post by **Dr.Cox** » Sun Jun 25, 2006 9:50 pm

testofskill wrote:New one

your best to date... i would current.

testofskill · Post by **testofskill** » Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:51 am

ok, i cureted it, ya i like it alot too, i think its my best.