New set

jks · Post by **jks** » Wed Jun 07, 2006 3:57 pm

The GameRenders people are by no stretch or measure the "all knowing sig gods of the underworld" they are not the best. They are good but not the best. I realize you are much better than me, but I hate to see that talent wasted on these cookie cutter sigs I see all the time at places like NSL and GR.

Phosphorous · Post by **Phosphorous** » Wed Jun 07, 2006 4:24 pm

Some of the NSL people are really good, but all the prof. sigs have the same look to them.

Infern0 · Post by **Infern0** » Thu Jun 08, 2006 6:38 am

Phosphorous wrote:Some of the NSL people are really good, but all the prof. sigs have the same look to them.

In my eyes, good is originality.

Originality has no limits though, so that's a plus.

Phosphorous · Post by **Phosphorous** » Thu Jun 08, 2006 11:23 am

Agreed, but just because a sig is orignal doesnt mean it is good. The idea needs to be executed well.

jks · Post by **jks** » Thu Jun 08, 2006 11:30 am

Yes, I could take a picture of myself and turn it into a clown and be original but that doesn't mean it would look good. McFarlane has the goodness part, but needs more originality. And more cowbell, gotta have more cowbell.

McFarlane · Post by **McFarlane** » Thu Jun 08, 2006 2:41 pm

testofskill · Post by **testofskill** » Thu Jun 08, 2006 4:55 pm

im sorry, but i really dont likethe style

Sandman · Post by **Sandman** » Sat Jun 17, 2006 7:44 pm

I don't mind the style much, it's just that they all look the same. And it doesn't seem that much work goes into them, because they are mainly C4D renders made by other people with a little brushing and a couple of filters. Disregarding all that, they look good

McFarlane · Post by **McFarlane** » Sun Jun 18, 2006 8:28 am

Sandman wrote:I don't mind the style much, it's just that they all look the same. And it doesn't seem that much work goes into them, because they are mainly C4D renders made by other people with a little brushing and a couple of filters. Disregarding all that, they look good

Ah, little one, I don't use brushes.
Except the default brush set, lightning sometimes, and also stardust sometimes.

This is C4D renders (And what makes you think they aren't mine) I made some of the C4D's used.

I used blurring
C4D
Smudge (some of them)
Filters
Sharpening
Pen tool
Tranformations
Hue / Saturation
Adjustment layers (Once in a while)
And I whole bunch of other crap nobody else wants to here.

Sandman · Post by **Sandman** » Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:21 am

Hear*

I'm not trying to bash your sigs, but it just seems like you're centering them on C4D packs made by other people.

Infern0 · Post by **Infern0** » Sun Jun 18, 2006 11:14 am

Luckily I make all of my C4D's.

You know why?

Because I can experiment all I want, and learn from it.

Then execute it in other idea's. This way I'll learn a lot.

=p

jks · Post by **jks** » Sun Jun 18, 2006 2:53 pm

I think we all agree that your sigs are good, but its the unoriginality that is your downfall, you could be brilliant if only you didn't follow the herd off the cliff, as it were. Branch out, experiment, make your own C4Ds, be original.

McFarlane · Post by **McFarlane** » Sun Jun 18, 2006 5:01 pm

I do make my own C4D's, I've been stating that for a while...