The Official Post Your Set Up Thread

DrXThirst · Post by **DrXThirst** » Mon Nov 17, 2008 7:00 pm

haha, thanks. I love it!

shadowkhas · Post by **shadowkhas** » Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:38 pm

DrXThirst wrote:n

bcuz itz not ubuntu rite

ScottyGEE · Post by **ScottyGEE** » Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:39 pm

Andrew_b wrote:post

I have a 640m also. I guess I understand why you want a gaming Rig

Your iPhone camera sucks/needs a clean/needs lighting

Andrew_b · Post by **Andrew_b** » Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:35 pm

ScottyGEE wrote:
Andrew_b wrote:post
I have a 640m also. I guess I understand why you want a gaming Rig
Your iPhone camera sucks/needs a clean/needs lighting

Yes, I have never experienced a gaming computer. Although I've read how fast and nice they are. And yes, my camera does need a clean.

antszy101 · Post by **antszy101** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 2:43 pm

shadowkhas wrote:
y/n

price?
I would say no as a preliminary suggestion...

[IA]Paul · Post by **[IA]Paul** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:16 pm

lol guise its a mac we no we love them mirite or mirite

mxrider108 · Post by **mxrider108** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:19 pm

[IA]Paul wrote:

lol guise its a mac we no we love them mirite or mirite

Damn, what comp do you have? That is a very low res. Also, upgrade to Leopard; it kicks ass.

[IA]Paul · Post by **[IA]Paul** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:27 pm

1024x768 is low res? lol.

I have a G5 Dual-Processor tower. I'm not upgrading to Leopard because I need to use Classic startup.

And I can't afford it.

shadowkhas · Post by **shadowkhas** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:34 pm

antszy101 wrote:
shadowkhas wrote:
y/n
price?
I would say no as a preliminary suggestion...

$800. :/ All it is is a laptop for school, not some octo-core monster.

[IA]Paul wrote:1024x768 is low res? lol.

Yes.

DrXThirst · Post by **DrXThirst** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:03 pm

[IA]Paul wrote:1024x768 is low res?

Yes, horribly.

ScottyGEE · Post by **ScottyGEE** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:32 pm

is 1280x800?

guysullavin · Post by **guysullavin** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 5:05 pm

[IA]Paul wrote:1024x768 is low res? lol.

I run 1680x1050

DrXThirst · Post by **DrXThirst** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 5:19 pm

I'm going to be running 1920x1080 on my new computer.

Yodel · Post by **Yodel** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 7:13 pm

I beat you all. 1920x1200

My screen resolution obviously reflects my masculinity.

ScottyGEE · Post by **ScottyGEE** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 7:22 pm

=o
Yodel for President 2012

mxrider108 · Post by **mxrider108** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 7:36 pm

Pshhh, I have 1920x1200 on my 17" laptop. Thats some high, high pixels per inch, fellas. But yeah, I'm surprised that's 1024x768 -- it seems smaller than I remembered it.

JK-47 · Post by **JK-47** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 10:34 pm

My monitor runs 1024x768.
It was a pain in the ass to get used to after my huge laptop monitor.

Veegie · Post by **Veegie** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 10:49 pm

Running 4880 x 2130 here.

DrXThirst · Post by **DrXThirst** » Wed Nov 19, 2008 3:33 am

-DeToX- · Post by **-DeToX-** » Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:29 am

You don't mess with Veggie.

Also I'm running 1024x768 =|...

My monitor doesn't support more somehow... Yet my 10 year old monitor supports way more >_<.