[MODEL]Really tight shotgun model

youhoo7 · Post by **youhoo7** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 8:37 pm

told you it wasnt wings...wings isnt good for making models rendering is its best quality...oh and i registered for milkshape premium witch has soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much more capibilities ....i love you model by the way i dont think i have said that yet

Lambda · Post by **Lambda** » Thu Apr 05, 2007 2:33 pm

I still say this should be moved to the Macintosh or Halo CE section seeing as PC dosn't have the tools to inject custom models unless they work in Custom Edition

and

you don't need that many faces just to make a cylinder, just move the faces and stretch it out, seeing as how that part is JUST a cylinder, but if you had some cool hand grip stuff there I would be okay with the high amount of polygons

to reiterate, I know you have to triangulate to get it ingame but that many polygons shouldn't be wasted just for a cylinder with some extruded faces.

And for future custom models PLEASE put them in the Macintosh section

TomClancey · Post by **TomClancey** » Fri Apr 06, 2007 2:57 pm

It's not a "great" model, buts it's definitely better than some I've seen. To get really good watch these plain modeling tutorials:

http://www.fpsbanana.com/tuts/332

and cs]zero, please shut up, no one cares that you think some guy is a piece of crap. And your point about you "making a game" doesn't matter in the world. Try and compare how many people (excluding you) who play your game compare to the people who've downloaded this guys shotgun. Also, just because you "made" a game doesn't mean it's any good at all...

~Tom

ZeroUltimateWarrior · Post by **ZeroUltimateWarrior** » Fri Apr 06, 2007 4:38 pm

nope not stolen, never seen it except for css....hmmmm

and zero....lol just...no....you are more than likely hawk....

Death Note · Post by **Death Note** » Fri Apr 06, 2007 4:43 pm

DkHawk · Post by **DkHawk** » Fri Apr 06, 2007 6:38 pm

O my god I am Hawk and I already apologized to {ghc}Pvt so you don't need to start up anything and how in gods name can you compare him to me?

and also I've never swort that much as Zero in all my life.

Leiukemia · Post by **Leiukemia** » Fri Apr 06, 2007 6:50 pm

I'm sorry, but that is a terrible model.

ZeroUltimateWarrior · Post by **ZeroUltimateWarrior** » Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:06 am

Leiukemia

WTF?

This is a very good model, And hawk I do not like saying it but anyone can let off their anger by posing as someone else on here...note Zero Joined YESTERDAY?

Lambda · Post by **Lambda** » Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:59 am

{ghc}PvtPwn wrote: I'm not stupid enough to use that many polys just for looks.

umm then whats the use of having that many polys if NOT for looks?

im gonna have to agree with Leiukemia the butt of the gun could use some touching up, and the grip is too high poly even though it lacks any detail

It could be alot better, but try to save the most polies while still getting the same-if not better-model

{ghc}PvtPwn · Post by **{ghc}PvtPwn** » Sat Apr 07, 2007 9:55 am

Lambda wrote:
{ghc}PvtPwn wrote: I'm not stupid enough to use that many polys just for looks.
umm then whats the use of having that many polys if NOT for looks?

Well, I just explained that like 20 times, lol. You have to triangulate it to prepare it for the ingame engine, and that's what it turned out like. And no, Hawk is not zero. Believe me, hawk and I have had "issues" in the past, but really, if I was still pissed at him, I would've said he was Zero already people. So no, he's just [DK]Hawk.

ZeroUltimateWarrior · Post by **ZeroUltimateWarrior** » Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:39 pm

Okay but being sure because people can fool you like that.

UPS · Post by **UPS** » Sun Apr 08, 2007 2:35 pm

I don't know Leiukemia, it kind of seems like with you that if someone's model isn't perfect, then it sucks. I think it's a pretty good model. I know you make pretty sweet models, but not everyone is that experienced right? Could loosen up a bit eh?
9/10

Leiukemia · Post by **Leiukemia** » Sun Apr 08, 2007 3:20 pm

:/ not really. If somebody has a decent model that needs work I'll tell them so. Perhaps it's just lately bad models have been coming out to make me look like a bad guy. And there's nothing wrong with striving for perfection. There's certain things I understand about how a model should look, how polygons should be used, smoothing groups, errors etc. Also, what guns should have, look like and things like that. One of the reasons people like things like this is because it has the basic shape of a gun. OMG a gun. It goes deeper then that. If you want to impress me, you need to show me proper polygon use, smoothing groups, accuracy, and even good renders would be more professional.

SnaFuBAR · Post by **SnaFuBAR** » Sun Apr 08, 2007 3:34 pm

it's a sucky model because it's a terrible waste of polygons and looks largely inaccurate.

enough said. christ, you people see something better than what you can do and you all start kissing ass, even though the lot of you is largely clueless about what a good model is. then, you start jumping all over the people who KNOW what they're talking about and start saying why this or that is not good and have a shitfit.

before you guys go critiquing anything... GET A FUCKING CLUE.

PvtPwn, it was a good attempt, but you need to learn about polygon distribution, form, shape, continuation surfaces and the like. when you start spouting off about "oh i'm so hot i got onto a team", know what you're doing because you're making the team standards look bad, and making yourself look like a fool.

also, your excuse "oh it has to triangulate blah blah blah and tha's what it turned out like" is total crap. if you hadn't used so many segments and sides, it wouldn't look like trash. Also, made in max and rendered in wings? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA!

don't ever do that again. F9 in max is your friend.

also, how is this a great model? no ejection port, no carrier, no rods... no. this is just bad.

cooldude5990 · Post by **cooldude5990** » Sun Apr 08, 2007 5:46 pm

SnaFuBAR wrote:it's a sucky model because it's a terrible waste of polygons and looks largely inaccurate.

enough said. christ, you people see something better than what you can do and you all start kissing ***, even though the lot of you is largely clueless about what a good model is. then, you start jumping all over the people who KNOW what they're talking about and start saying why this or that is not good and have a ***.

before you guys go critiquing anything... GET A *** CLUE.

PvtPwn, it was a good attempt, but you need to learn about polygon distribution, form, shape, continuation surfaces and the like. when you start spouting off about "oh i'm so hot i got onto a team", know what you're doing because you're making the team standards look bad, and making yourself look like a fool.

also, your excuse "oh it has to triangulate blah blah blah and tha's what it turned out like" is total crap. if you hadn't used so many segments and sides, it wouldn't look like trash. Also, made in max and rendered in wings? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA!

don't ever do that again. F9 in max is your friend.

also, how is this a great model? no ejection port, no carrier, no rods... no. this is just bad.

snafs my boy

Cryticfarm · Post by **Cryticfarm** » Sun Apr 08, 2007 7:20 pm

Ok this is a horrible model for 3d studio max. It is a giant waste of poly gons and it need a smooth on the handle (thats a problem because that means more polys). It looks like a bad attempt at plane modeling. I it was made in wings i'd be suprised though.

DkHawk · Post by **DkHawk** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:18 am

Ok this is a horrible model for 3d studio max. It is a giant waste of poly gons and it need a smooth on the handle (thats a problem because that means more polys). It looks like a bad attempt at plane modeling. I it was made in wings i'd be suprised though.

Ok dude it wasn't made on 3ds Max it was made in Wings 3d

Leiukemia · Post by **Leiukemia** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 1:04 am

DkHawk wrote:
Ok this is a horrible model for 3d studio max. It is a giant waste of poly gons and it need a smooth on the handle (thats a problem because that means more polys). It looks like a bad attempt at plane modeling. I it was made in wings i'd be suprised though.
Ok dude it wasn't made on 3ds Max it was made in Wings 3d

Ok guys, lol, sorry I haven't checked on this thread for a while, that's why there is all these unanswered questions. Ok, so here I go:
No I didn't make this on Wings 3d, I made it in 3ds Max and then used Wings 3d to render it.

Um, you need to read the whole topic next time. Honestly, you'd only even have to read the first page.

SnaFuBAR · Post by **SnaFuBAR** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 1:10 am

DkHawk wrote:Ok dude it wasn't made on 3ds Max it was made in Wings 3d

{ghc}PvtPwn wrote: No I didn't make this on Wings 3d, I made it in 3ds Max and then used Wings 3d to render it.

good thing you read huh? fukwit.

Caboose{SE} · Post by **Caboose{SE}** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:52 am

everything snaf, falcon and leiuki said...and

{ghc}PvtPwn wrote:Well guys, I've finally discovered how to make great models, infact, I got accepted into the Emerald Mod Team for it.

gettin a little egotistic there? either way you're quite wrong. model does not come close to great...and the who the fuck is the emerald mod team? don't call yourself good unless someone else thinks you're good...and incase you can't pick up on that either, none of us do.

I'm not stupid enough to use that many polys just for looks.

....you're dumb.

Yes it has a lot of polys (3,000) because you have to triangulate it, lol!

no sir...it does not...

model is a huge waste of polies, why would you render in wings 3d..., it's inaccurate, lacks detail.

HaloMods "Classic" Read-only Archive

[MODEL]Really tight shotgun model

Re: [MODEL]Really tight shotgun model