[Second Model] Beretta CX4 Storm

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 11:04 am

Here's my second model, a Beretta CX4 Storm. 3,750 polies.

rossmum · Post by **rossmum** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 5:45 pm

Seems a little narrow, but holy crap. That's awesome.

Your second model pwns all of mine so far... I need those plane tuts... >_>

[cc]z@nd! · Post by **[cc]z@nd!** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 7:55 pm

nice model. the worst i see is stupid shader groups, but that's hard to prevent. looks like it'd be fun to use, nice model! especially compared to my attempts.

maca_§ · Post by **maca_§** » Sat Jul 15, 2006 8:16 pm

Not bad at all, well done.
Looks a lil too smooth in places but what do I know about modeling :p.

The science of Kaboom · Sun Jul 16, 2006 11:01 am

looks cool.

SnaFuBAR · Post by **SnaFuBAR** » Sun Jul 16, 2006 11:13 am

thin and flat, with some obvious innaccuracies, but good attention to detail, especially for a second model. i suggest looking over your references more carefully, and fixing this model up.

Doctor · Post by **Doctor** » Sun Jul 16, 2006 12:13 pm

Nice, Ravn.

Once again though, your a little thin

I guess it is better then being fat

.

sorry, lousy humor ^^

JK-47 · Post by **JK-47** » Sun Jul 16, 2006 7:29 pm

I saw that at the gun store yesterday, your model is way to thin at the bottom, other than that it looks pretty good.

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Wed Jul 19, 2006 4:08 pm

Any other comments? I was hoping to get some more.

mR_r0b0to_v2 · Post by **mR_r0b0to_v2** » Wed Jul 19, 2006 4:27 pm

it's a nicely made model, but the smoothing groups could use a bit more work, the barrel is too thin, and the scope needs more details

also try rendering on a lighter background, its so much easier to see

that is all

Grunt Rebel · Post by **Grunt Rebel** » Wed Jul 19, 2006 5:45 pm

Looks cool! A little to thin for me tho.

cooldude5990 · Post by **cooldude5990** » Wed Jul 19, 2006 5:59 pm

SnaFuBAR wrote:thin and flat, with some obvious innaccuracies, but good attention to detail, especially for a second model. i suggest looking over your references more carefully, and fixing this model up.

everything i was going to say lol. but thats very good for a secound model

Monk · Post by **Monk** » Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:52 pm

looks like a lightweight future sniper nice job

(sccan)dudz · Post by **(sccan)dudz** » Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:09 pm

i love it its

Darco · Post by **Darco** » Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:48 pm

oooh a left handed rifle. i love it!

V0Lt4Ge · Post by **V0Lt4Ge** » Wed Aug 30, 2006 8:05 pm

Bump?

=\

rossmum · Post by **rossmum** » Thu Aug 31, 2006 4:18 am

V0Lt4Ge wrote:Bump?

=\

Yeah. Ugh.

Good a model as it is, DON'T BUMP.

mR_r0b0to_v2 · Post by **mR_r0b0to_v2** » Thu Aug 31, 2006 4:24 am

o.0

that wasn't monk, that was...

(sccan)dudz!!

rossmum · Post by **rossmum** » Thu Aug 31, 2006 4:33 am

Shhh. I blame Snakes... on a Plane.

gh0570fchurch · Post by **gh0570fchurch** » Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:16 pm

rossmum wrote:Seems a little narrow

Yeah, that's the first thing I noticed, but otherwise it's pretty good. Maybe you could widen it up a bit.