Phantom

Phosphorous · Post by **Phosphorous** » Mon May 22, 2006 3:41 pm

Post your comments and suggestions, this is still a WIP.

Grave · Post by **Grave** » Mon May 22, 2006 3:46 pm

Pretty nice I like it.

gh0570fchurch · Post by **gh0570fchurch** » Mon May 22, 2006 3:50 pm

kinda hard to see the render, otherwise i like it.

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Mon May 22, 2006 4:20 pm

Very nice, but like I said before, it could use some contrast and sharpening.

Phosphorous · Post by **Phosphorous** » Mon May 22, 2006 4:22 pm

RaVNzCRoFT wrote:Very nice, but like I said before, it could use some contrast and sharpening.

For the render or the background?

The phantom is already sharpened and has the contrast bumped up to about 50.

xXxCocoFangxXx · Post by **xXxCocoFangxXx** » Mon May 22, 2006 4:23 pm

Looks pretty good.

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Mon May 22, 2006 4:30 pm

I'd say do a Filter > Sharpen for both the render and background...just experiment with contrast. It doesn't need it, but it might look better.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Mon May 22, 2006 4:37 pm

RaVNzCRoFT wrote:I'd say do a Filter > Sharpen for both the render and background...just experiment with contrast. It doesn't need it, but it might look better.

Fireworks has that?

Anyways, I love this sig. Probably the best Ive seen in Recent months.

[offtopic] Now that Macromedia has been merged with Adobe, are they ever gonna make fireworks again?[/offtopic]

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Mon May 22, 2006 4:38 pm

Cuda wrote:Fireworks has that?

Darn, I always forgot that Phos uses Fireworks. I know Fireworks has a sharpen tool; I don't know if it has a filter that sharpens the whole piece evenly.

Phosphorous · Post by **Phosphorous** » Mon May 22, 2006 4:39 pm

Cuda wrote:
RaVNzCRoFT wrote:I'd say do a Filter > Sharpen for both the render and background...just experiment with contrast. It doesn't need it, but it might look better.
Fireworks has that?

Anyways, I love this sig. Probably the best Ive seen in Recent months.

[offtopic] Now that Macromedia has been merged with Adobe, are they ever gonna make fireworks again?[/offtopic]

Its called Photoworks, and no, I cant filter>sharpen. I do have a sharpen tool though. After I get some more feedback Ill post an update.

jks · Post by **jks** » Mon May 22, 2006 6:52 pm

Dunno whats there, but what I see is good.

testofskill · Post by **testofskill** » Mon May 22, 2006 8:05 pm

I cant see the whole "M" on the name in the sig

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Mon May 22, 2006 8:24 pm

testofskill wrote:I cant see the whole "M" on the name in the sig

Doesn't need the M. thats what makes it sooo damn slick

Patrickssj6 · Post by **Patrickssj6** » Tue May 23, 2006 10:35 am

I think it looks better on black background.Good job I like it

Phosphorous · Post by **Phosphorous** » Tue May 23, 2006 11:08 am

jks wrote:Dunno whats there, but what I see is good.

Its a phantom dropship.

Its a view from the bottom-rear.

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Tue May 23, 2006 12:04 pm

testofskill wrote:I cant see the whole "M" on the name in the sig

Who cares? You can see P-H-A-N-T-O. I wonder what the last letter is.

testofskill · Post by **testofskill** » Tue May 23, 2006 2:52 pm

ya but then people are gonna say

have you seen phantos sig?
or
have you seen phantons sig?

Phosphorous · Post by **Phosphorous** » Tue May 23, 2006 2:54 pm

testofskill wrote:ya but then people are gonna say

have you seen phantos sig?
or
have you seen phantons sig?

Name's Phosphorous, Phantom is the title of the sig.

About half the M is visible, too, and with the render to help people I hope that they can figure it out.

testofskill · Post by **testofskill** » Tue May 23, 2006 3:02 pm

oh my bad, i thought that your name was phantom, i didnt look at your name.

SORRY