First sig in a loooong time

Rallos · Post by **Rallos** » Wed Apr 19, 2006 9:27 pm

I think this is probably one of my better ones. I know, the text sucks. You don't have to tell me.

Edit: Yes, I know it is over the max file size. I wasn't planning on currenting it.

VoYdE · Post by **VoYdE** » Wed Apr 19, 2006 9:36 pm

HAha the text sucks

but its good

maca_§ · Post by **maca_§** » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:10 pm

I love it all except for the text.

wes · Post by **wes** » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:25 pm

[quote="maca_

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:40 am

Rallos wrote:I think this is probably one of my better ones. I know, the text sucks. You don't have to tell me.

Edit: Yes, I know it is over the max file size. I wasn't planning on currenting it.

well, now that you got that out of your system, you can stop for a while...

nah, j/k. The text does look a bit off.

gh0570fchurch · Post by **gh0570fchurch** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 9:39 am

the text doesnt fit the style of the text... other than that, the sig looks good, even if it is hard to tell what it is.

halobuddha · Post by **halobuddha** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 2:58 pm

wtf r u guys doing he said he knows the text sux and not to tell him about it and even if i dont think he needs to here it from like 80 ppl i dont like it that much i dont know y too bland mb? oh well

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:14 pm

The text effects aren't bad, but the font doesn't fit. Find a font that matches the grunge-abstract background, and you'll be fine. The opacity of the text is good because it shows the colors. I like everything else, also.

Rallos · Post by **Rallos** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 9:33 pm

Meh..too lazy to change it.

I just ended up making something else >_>

I never have been good at text...

Phosphorous · Post by **Phosphorous** » Fri Apr 21, 2006 11:38 am

Sweet.

the text could use some work, Id lose the outline and try to blend it differently.

JK-47 · Post by **JK-47** » Fri Apr 21, 2006 11:47 am

Why does everyone give 70% more about text? Whenever i see critisizm its like it it would be 10/10 but the text sucks so im going to give it a 5/10. It takes about 5 seconds to put on text and give it an effect to make it look like its on there properly, but it takes about 10-50 minutes to make the actuall sig. Pay attention to work rather than text sometime. Thats like saying Vincent Vangough was a terrible artist because his handwriting sucked.

Nice sigs Rallos, 10/10 on both.

Phosphorous · Post by **Phosphorous** » Fri Apr 21, 2006 11:51 am

multi-genre wrote:Why does everyone give 70% more about text? Whenever i see critisizm its like it it would be 10/10 but the text sucks so im going to give it a 5/10. It takes about 5 seconds to put on text and give it an effect to make it look like its on there properly, but it takes about 10-50 minutes to make the actuall sig. Pay attention to work rather than text sometime. Thats like saying Vincent Vangough was a terrible artist because his handwriting sucked.

Nice sigs Rallos, 10/10 on both.

Since the rest of the sig is really good, I comment on the parts that need work. In this case its the text.

halobuddha · Post by **halobuddha** » Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:34 pm

multi-genre wrote:Why does everyone give 70% more about text? Whenever i see critisizm its like it it would be 10/10 but the text sucks so im going to give it a 5/10. It takes about 5 seconds to put on text and give it an effect to make it look like its on there properly, but it takes about 10-50 minutes to make the actuall sig. Pay attention to work rather than text sometime. Thats like saying Vincent Vangough was a terrible artist because his handwriting sucked.

Nice sigs Rallos, 10/10 on both.

hes got a good point serouisly its good to care about text but i think some people care way too much about the text and they forget that this is artwork not a text competition i think text deserves about a points worth on a scale two at most but definitlely no more

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:36 pm

The text is better, but the border is not. Since some areas of the signature touch the white skin, the overlayed border does not show. You should just make the border black, so none of those white parts on the edges blend with the forum skin.

Rallos · Post by **Rallos** » Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:00 pm

RaVNzCRoFT wrote:The text is better, but the border is not. Since some areas of the signature touch the white skin, the overlayed border does not show. You should just make the border black, so none of those white parts on the edges blend with the forum skin.

Done

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:03 pm

then tubes remind me of a Hair viewed through an Electron Microscope.

wes · Post by **wes** » Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:06 pm

lol, it does look like hair

dos mes · Post by **dos mes** » Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:23 pm

Wow, Rallos has a lot of dandruf in there too

Rallos · Post by **Rallos** » Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:24 pm

Dos Mes wrote:Wow, Rallos has a lot of dandruf in there too

And my head is exploding >_>

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Sat Apr 22, 2006 3:37 am

Much better with that border.

HaloMods "Classic" Read-only Archive

First sig in a loooong time

First sig in a loooong time

Re: First sig in a loooong time