good tech sig

halobuddha · Post by **halobuddha** » Tue Apr 18, 2006 7:34 pm

ok here is the first tech sig that i thought was good

wes · Post by **wes** » Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:06 pm

the tech looks overloaded IMO
lighten up mb

Dr.Cox · Post by **Dr.Cox** » Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:12 pm

its over the file size.. limit...

halobuddha · Post by **halobuddha** » Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:14 pm

oh well
its still a sig isnt it?

Dr.Cox · Post by **Dr.Cox** » Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:15 pm

yes but it has to be 75 or under ur like 94 or something

Bandwith problem. i suggest taking it down unlees u want a mod to.

halobuddha · Post by **halobuddha** » Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:18 pm

im lazy ill let a mod do it lol XD

wes · Post by **wes** » Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:56 pm

halobuddha wrote:im lazy ill let a mod do it lol XD

that a way!

Kurroda · Post by **Kurroda** » Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:44 pm

way to much tech

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Wed Apr 19, 2006 3:22 pm

Way too much tech brushing. Did you do a Hue/Saturation on the render? It just seems like it's not supposed to be green.

Kurroda · Post by **Kurroda** » Wed Apr 19, 2006 3:23 pm

Its not the render is pink

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Wed Apr 19, 2006 3:25 pm

Oh. Well how did you color it? Color Balance or Hue/Saturation?

Patrickssj6 · Post by **Patrickssj6** » Wed Apr 19, 2006 4:17 pm

At least you hvave improved alot and thats better then any sig

halobuddha · Post by **halobuddha** » Wed Apr 19, 2006 6:50 pm

thnx patrick and yeah i agree it is alot of brushing i used hue/saturation but at least i got the text right

lol ravnz

McFarlane · Post by **McFarlane** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 9:34 am

What is up with you guys and always monitoring the kb size?
You act like you'll lose all your friends (if you have any) if you go over it by like 100.
1 extra second isn't gonna kill you.

gh0570fchurch · Post by **gh0570fchurch** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 9:36 am

you realize that there may be some ppl here w/ a 56k connection (maybe, or they might be hiding >_>)

McFarlane · Post by **McFarlane** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 9:40 am

gh0570fchurch wrote:you realize that there may be some ppl here w/ a 56k connection (maybe, or they might be hiding >_>)

That means it'll take them 2 seconds.
(56 goes into one hundred a little more than two times, so less then two seconds)

halobuddha · Post by **halobuddha** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 2:55 pm

yeah ok back on topic what about the sig?

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:12 pm

halobuddha wrote:at least i got the text right lol ravnz

It's not bad, but it's not good either. And no offense, but it's not like a pixel font is hard to get right.

halobuddha · Post by **halobuddha** » Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:13 pm

lolz well its better than me "whoring" space age right? XD

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:31 pm

Absolutely. Please never use that font again.

The pixel font looks good, but I'm just saying since there's no fill for pixel fonts, there's not many effects to give them. Therefore, they're not hard to make look good. But nonetheless, it looks good.