Anotha sucktastic sig! =D

BEEF!!! · Post by **BEEF!!!** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 5:54 pm

I tried to remember back some of the crits on my last sig and I made this one.
The lights in the background are in my first c4d render.

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 6:02 pm

I like it, it's very unique. I do think you should make that border black, though.

BEEF!!! · Post by **BEEF!!!** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 6:03 pm

Updated.

maca_§ · Post by **maca_§** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 6:24 pm

Colour

.
I like.

Phosphorous · Post by **Phosphorous** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:00 pm

Itd be a lot better if you did something cool with the text to make flow better with the background.

McFarlane · Post by **McFarlane** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:02 pm

Not to be mean but... It worries me.

wes · Post by **wes** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:26 pm

another sucktastic sig dave! congrats!

any i see maca is still up to his usual "color" scheme... enough joking around, it looks nice BEEF, too bad i didn't see the one before the update

BEEF!!! · Post by **BEEF!!!** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:28 pm

[XBOX]BigAFair wrote:Not to be mean but... It worries me.

You callin me gay or you just saying it sucks? =P

I rezlize it's not the best but Im still trying to improve. Any specific suggestion on how to make the text flow a little better? Text was always one of my weaker subjects >.>

wes · Post by **wes** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:29 pm

have the inside of the text be transparent mb? (lol idk i haven't touched photoshop for a while)

BEEF!!! · Post by **BEEF!!!** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:30 pm

It is. I bumped it down to 70% if I remember right.

wes · Post by **wes** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:32 pm

i meant like... it's at 0 opacity, but the black stroke is still fully visible (to take away the whiteness inside)

BEEF!!! · Post by **BEEF!!!** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:41 pm

Ohh... That probably isn't a good idea because it would be a black stroke on a black BG.

wes · Post by **wes** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:56 pm

hey you're right! mb a glow would help? lol don't listen to me, i don't know what i'm talking about here

gh0570fchurch · Post by **gh0570fchurch** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:57 pm

i know this is kinda off-topic, but you notice the title of the thread- he calls it a "sucktastic" sig...

wes · Post by **wes** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:25 pm

wes wrote:another sucktastic sig

hmmm... i dunno... i've never noticed that the thread title said that...

gh0570fchurch · Post by **gh0570fchurch** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:28 pm

srry, i didnt read all the posts...

wes · Post by **wes** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:35 pm

lol indeed

when he says "sucktastic" sig, there are two possible meanings of which are somewhat confusing. it can mean sucktastic as in it sucks **** really badly. or sucktastic as in sucking, but not really sucking at all. like a d+.

BEEF!!! · Post by **BEEF!!!** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 4:18 am

Aparently you havn't seen my otha sigs

. I just said sucktastic because I thought I would get the regular "You suck" responses.

wes · Post by **wes** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 10:56 am

you suck

but you're getting better ;o

Patrickssj6 · Post by **Patrickssj6** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:50 am

Phosphorous wrote:Itd be a lot better if you did something cool with the text to make flow better with the background.

/\ What he sais /\