new sig

Patrickssj6 · Post by **Patrickssj6** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 6:40 pm

To simple 6.5/10

Background is Lame,Text not that good either

I know this was hard critisism

Driv3r · Post by **Driv3r** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 6:44 pm

np
i havnt been a ble to find a cool brush set in a while and when i try fourns brush set it only comes with one brush

EDIT: complete transformation

maca_§ · Post by **maca_§** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 7:18 pm

I agree it's too simple.

lxNicktardxl · Post by **lxNicktardxl** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 8:23 am

Patrickssj6 wrote:To simple 6.5/10

Background is Lame,Text not that good either

I know this was hard critisism

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:23 am

Are those abstract render brushes in the first one?

Driv3r · Post by **Driv3r** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 10:09 am

yeah i think so

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 3:31 pm

No offense, but you sure learn how to make your own renders. It will come in handy. Nice signature, though.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 5:48 pm

simplicity can be a good thing in some sigs, but this is bland.

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:06 pm

I see that you tried to blend the guns and the cape, but you really should blend the right side of his head. That's really the part of the render that clashes the most.

Driv3r · Post by **Driv3r** » Tue Feb 21, 2006 12:16 pm

hows this:

yeah i gotta learn how to make my own renders

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Tue Feb 21, 2006 2:33 pm

I dont like how the gun is transparent.