new sig

Kurroda · Post by **Kurroda** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:27 pm

yes i no the it is not 75 kb i am gonna fix it tommorow cuz i dont have time to night

wes · Post by **wes** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:41 pm

why did you mention the filesize?

but for the sig, i really don't like it. to me it's like most sigs i see everyday, most of the backround is made up of brushing. apart from that, i don't really like it. the text isn't a match, too much deadspace, and the render isn't really fit for that backround

The_Hushed_Casket · Post by **The_Hushed_Casket** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:22 pm

Just FYI, it's not only over the filesize limit, it's also 6 (or 11, I forget) pixels over the height limit.

lxNicktardxl · Post by **lxNicktardxl** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 11:10 am

wes wrote:why did you mention the filesize?

but for the sig, i really don't like it. to me it's like most sigs i see everyday, most of the backround is made up of brushing. apart from that, i don't really like it. the text isn't a match, too much deadspace, and the render isn't really fit for that backround

E X A C T L Y!

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 4:02 pm

that render isnt that good. the snow from the original picture is on the render itself so the best you can do to salvage that render is to add a snowy effect to the sig itself.

nR`Shadow · Post by **nR`Shadow** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 8:48 am

put more depth in the BG