MODEL: High Poly

Caboose{SE} · Post by **Caboose{SE}** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 3:28 pm

i believe veegie is right, don't always matter what you think. you objective is to please everyone else. if your just doin this for fun this is not always the place to post.

Veegie[Temp] · Post by **Veegie[Temp]** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 3:43 pm

I think the case here is quite the opposite. I think he's trying to take it too seriously.

SnaFuBAR · Post by **SnaFuBAR** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:53 pm

besides, the model isn't that fantastic anyways. it's got a lot of innacuracies. it has complex surfaces. your model is very flat, and does not show the surface qualities an mp5 exibits. now you can stop acting like you're the awesome sauce because you can make spline and primitive weapons.

Kirk · Post by **Kirk** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:42 pm

It just seems like there are tons of wasted polys. The same thing could be created with at least 1/8th the amount fairly easily.

Not terrible though, it's alright.

soccerbummer1104 · Post by **soccerbummer1104** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:12 am

a model like that isnt very detailed and definatly shouldnt be that hight polly. a model like that should be at least beneath 5k. just look at katarns models. most of them are like 10 times as detailed and have about the same polly count as that thing does. it would probably help if you hade it all 1 mesh and had no overlapping faces.

Munsie · Post by **Munsie** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 8:42 am

Veegie wrote:This example seems fitting here, "Do movie critics make movies?"

That's deep.

~Munsie