M4A1 model *Updated*
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 11:46 am
- Location: UP YOURS!
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 10:18 am
- Location: http://www.videotuts.net/
- Contact:
oh. samio, i found a few things to complain about. The grip doesn't meld into the receiver like it should, in fact, either the receiver is too thick or the grip is too thin, and the geometry should be 1 piece, on the reference pic, you can see that the grip really is a part of the receiver. The grip shouldn't be flat on the sides, it is pretty round all the way around. The cylinder of the telescopic stock is scaled wrong, and the stock is, once again, too thin. The magazine port is to wide. The upper part of the receiver should have that round little thing. You are completely missing the t-bone bolt thing (cocking mechanism) on the back of the upper receiver
Last edited by Katarn on Tue Mar 22, 2005 11:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Excalibur: id hunt him down and jerk him off
Excalibur: and drink the gallons of cum that come out
Excalibur: and drink the gallons of cum that come out
-
- Posts: 5426
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 12:12 pm
- Location: I'm a Paranoid
- Contact:
![]() |
![]() |
-
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 10:18 am
- Location: http://www.videotuts.net/
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 5426
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 12:12 pm
- Location: I'm a Paranoid
- Contact:
![]() |
![]() |
ey weapon pro i don't care
Edit:sorry but i think the weapon is ok and i don't know any weapon that's out there
Edit:sorry but i think the weapon is ok and i don't know any weapon that's out there
Last edited by Patrickssj6 on Tue Mar 22, 2005 11:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
...left for good
-
- Posts: 5426
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 12:12 pm
- Location: I'm a Paranoid
- Contact:
![]() |
![]() |
-
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 10:18 am
- Location: http://www.videotuts.net/
- Contact:
jks wrote:Update looks awesome, but as usual I bet katarn is going to destroy it...
Already did.Katarn wrote:oh. samio, i found a few things to complain about. The grip doesn't meld into the receiver like it should, in fact, either the receiver is too thick or the grip is too thin, and the geometry should be 1 piece, on the reference pic, you can see that the grip really is a part of the receiver. The grip shouldn't be flat on the sides, it is pretty round all the way around. The cylinder of the telescopic stock is scaled wrong, and the stock is, once again, too thin. The magazine port is to wide. The upper part of the receiver should have that round little thing. You are completely missing the t-bone bolt thing (cocking mechanism) on the back of the upper receiver
Excalibur: id hunt him down and jerk him off
Excalibur: and drink the gallons of cum that come out
Excalibur: and drink the gallons of cum that come out
-
- Posts: 5426
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 12:12 pm
- Location: I'm a Paranoid
- Contact:
![]() |
![]() |
-
- Posts: 5426
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 12:12 pm
- Location: I'm a Paranoid
- Contact:
![]() |
![]() |
-
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 10:18 am
- Location: http://www.videotuts.net/
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 5426
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 12:12 pm
- Location: I'm a Paranoid
- Contact:
![]() |
![]() |
-
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 10:18 am
- Location: http://www.videotuts.net/
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 5426
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 12:12 pm
- Location: I'm a Paranoid
- Contact:
![]() |
![]() |
-
- Posts: 5426
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 12:12 pm
- Location: I'm a Paranoid
- Contact:
![]() |
![]() |