New UFO sighting O.o

[Yamagushi]

http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=1006571&cache=1

[GametagAeonFlux]

Old, viral marketing for something I think, it's been proved CGI. If a real UFO spotting was seen, and posted on a video site, I think the government would take it down.

[gh0570fchurch]

I don't see how they could've been that big without anyone else noticing. Fake, I'd say. Plus, everyone conveniently carries a camera with them filming constantly in case of UFOs.

[BEEF!!!]

Agree'd with GTAF.
But let's be serious. It was that terrible, ultra fake 'I'm so shocked' gasp that the lady made that really gave it away .

[GametagAeonFlux]

LA Times did an article on how/why it's fake.

[Tural]

This is faker than.. something really fake.

Anyone who thinks something so massive could be true, and there would be only one video of it, and that it would not be covered by any news corporations must be incredibly gullible.

GTAF's post, etc.

I think you should reopen that topic

I locked it, not Gametag.

as the LA times video in my opinion seems faker than the original videos

Because it's designed to show that it's fake, it's not attempting to be convincing. You're saying it's not valid because it's doing exactly what it was designed to do...

as youll notice in theres there small "ufo" is incapable of smooth flying unlike there larger counterparts,

It only flew upwards, it didn't go forwards. When moving forward, it would very likely be more balanced than trying to maintain a stationary position.

secondly they can only stay straight where as the large ones turned and continued flying at a 90% angle

Couldn't be post production, considering the person is a professional animator, of course not. It also could not be another device. They only showed one, so that means none others exist. Clearly.

also youll notice a large video quality difference between them

Again, the videos were designed to look real, so they shot it in low quality. Who would believe a UFO video shot in HD? People would look at it and know, just from the quality, that it was fake. They were trying to make it look real, thus there is a quality difference because it needed to be convincing. Common sense, really. In addition, YouTube destroys video quality.

and lastly, two old ladys

So? That doesn't have any relevance, at all, to anything.

[TomClancey]

I'd seen that video before, but there was no screaming in the background.

[neodos]

LA Times did an article on how/why it's fake.

I want to know where i can buy that, awesome xD

[Ombre]

http://www.moller.com/xm2.htm Anyone else notice how some of the older moller skycars look just like UFO's?

[Ultramarines217]

Seriousely how can people just be there when it happens heres an example
Quote: i sharp breath. if that was real ppl would of been goin omfg and stuff.
A kinda the same but family guy version
http://youtube.com/watch?v=kthOf0RSpo8

[newbymodder]

lol wow haha a ufo that close id pay money to see that like in real time not a video

[JK-47]

lol wow haha a ufo that close id pay money to see that like in real time not a video

Looks like you're going to be keeping your money.

[slayer410]

Haha.

"for creating this video
09/03/2007by myql2000
for creating this video you need: -Vue 6 extreme (for palm trees , sky -default startup sky was used- and wind simulation) ** notice the trees are clones. -3D Max, Maya or C4D to create UFO model / lights and animations -After effects or Combustion post editing for camera blur effects and flares. But I could be wrong "