HaloMods "Classic" Read-only Archive

well i decided to stop learning vb, i said to myself unstead of taking time learning this i could learn a better language, so i read up and i descided to learn Visual C# 2005 but i need some help i have some videos for it but if anyone noes of and tuts video or you can just help me your self that would be great and if your saying why dont you by a book well because i tend to buy a book like i did with my c++ book and i never pick it up again ,wasted 30 dollars. thanks

C# us great.I think the microsoft has some listed.

www.codeproject.com has some nice articles for C#\.NET.

As for C# 2.0 for .NET 2, I haven't been able to go out and look at anything, but I've always found the books published by MS to be good reads.
The book I learned C# with .NET 1.1 was published by MS.

so out of ur guys opion what do u think i should continue learning vb or learn c# o and one other thing which is the best out of c to learn i want to make things like mod tools,emulators etc.

http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/expre ... fault.aspx
^
there are some video tutorials for Visual C#

and i tried visual baisc a while ago and stopped because i got confused. ive been programming in C# for a couple of monthes now and ive gotten a lot farther than i did in visual basic.

well i program in vb and would start csharp but theres one very big difference. vb is more supported by microsoft and theres alot more help sites the error handling is good and csharps error handling sucks it doesnt catch them till it trys to debug but thats my opionon. it is a faster langauge but i still like vb i mean if u can wait and extra .5-1 seconds something is wrong with u :-p

modder4321 wrote:well i program in vb and would start csharp but theres one very big difference. vb is more supported by microsoft and theres alot more help sites the error handling is good and csharps error handling sucks it doesnt catch them till it trys to debug but thats my opionon. it is a faster langauge but i still like vb i mean if u can wait and extra .5-1 seconds something is wrong with u :-p

C# code is compiled into ILasm code. Same with VB.NET code, its all the same. C#'s error handling does NOT suck. You probably just don't know what your doing.
If VB (orginal, not VB.NET) is "more supported" by MS, then how come its not apart of VS.NET? Because they're finally moving on. .NET is their new weapon.

.NET is alot easier and faster to develop with than the orginal VB. Period.

i am talking about vb.net. and i did say it my opionon

and vb6 is to old and slow to be a part of vs.net and also vs.net note it has only .net langauges

modder4321 wrote:also vs.net note it has only .net langauges

No, it also has native C++.