Page 1 of 1

Undescribable

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:28 pm
by Trulife8342
Image

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:11 pm
by Dr.Cox
No.

There's alot of dead empty space in the middle.

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:13 pm
by Trulife8342
I dont know I think that its an amazing sig I love it a lot.

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:18 pm
by noscottno
Trulife8342 wrote:I dont know I think that its an amazing sig I love it a lot.
I think you're starting to get a little full of yourself (no offense). There's always room for improvement. I don't think this sig needs text, and I think there is to much dead space. Still a good sig.

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:22 pm
by Trulife8342
I don't think that comment was needed even though you meant it with no offense, There are a lot of artists who love their work and does that make them "full of themselves", I didnt denote Dr.Cox's criticism, I just said I thought my sig was amazing and I love it, Im not saying no your wrong and I dont agree with you at all, im just very proud of myself and I was just expressing that, That does not make me full of myself....

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:24 pm
by Ragdoll
Trulife8342 wrote:I don't think that comment was needed even though you meant it with no offense, There are a lot of artists who love their work and does that make them "full of themselves", I didnt denote Dr.Cox's criticism, I just said I thought my sig was amazing and I love it, Im not saying no your wrong and I dont agree with you at all, im just very proud of myself and I was just expressing that, That does not make me full of myself....
Werd, I think this is a lovely sig.

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:34 pm
by Dr.Cox
Then why post Tru?

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:37 pm
by Trulife8342
im looking for constructive criticism for my sig, not my personality.

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:47 pm
by Dr.Cox
We sure did give you constructive criticsim... then you made the comment that makes it sound like you think its perfect: "I dont need to change anything because it's so darn good looking to me."

Even I thought you were being a cocky shit.


Its a good signature... But its not that great. (Text/Deadspace)

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:49 pm
by Trulife8342
I said I dont know, how does that infer that I completely did not care about what you said, I did not sound cocky I said I love my sig, What the hell are you guys talking about?

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 2:24 pm
by Hawaiian Modder
I like it, All of your sigs are so elegant and nice.
You should try a bigger piece. I bet it would come out great.

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 2:27 pm
by JacksonCougAr
Isn't it annoying Tru how people can completely de-rail a thread by pig-headedness?

I think its awesome, my only complaint would be it looks "fuzzy", ie: not very clear and a bit blurred.

Ps: wanna be a pal and make cougar a remnant sig?

Much Thanks, Cougar.

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 2:28 pm
by Trulife8342
sure ill make you a sig

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 2:30 pm
by JacksonCougAr
Looking at it closer i realized that it meant to be blurry along the top "glass". So really my only thing is that my eyes are drawn to that void, maybe a supernova could sparkle things up?

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 3:01 pm
by Pepsi
tru, your work is awesome and i think its great but after awhile all your sigs start looking the same. im sure your next sig will have the same things the last 4 did before them. i normally dont give C&C back on stuff like this but its my opinion. i see people like cox or soup how they present one style one week then use a different the next. i see them more as artists cause there developing more then one style then staying in the same set pattern.

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 9:17 pm
by Lt Slap a ho
It's........ indescribable*.....


I kid, I kid.


It's ok, no real focal.

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 9:41 pm
by Aumaan Anubis
It's pretty nice.

But, like others, I can't seem to find a central point. My eyes keep shifting from one side to the other, not really sure what to "rest" on.

Good job though.

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 9:48 pm
by -DeToX-
Lt Slap a ho wrote:It's ok, no real focal.