My Dog
- Lt Slap a ho
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 6:34 pm
- LostWithin
- Posts: 483
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 4:10 pm
- Location: Massachusetts Team:FoxHalo.com
- Contact:
- Lt Slap a ho
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 6:34 pm
- Sgt.Peppers
- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 1:25 pm
- Location: Texas
- Lt Slap a ho
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 6:34 pm
- little_shadow
- Posts: 422
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 6:59 am
- Location: Houston, Texas
- Contact:
- kornkidcrazy
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 10:48 am
- Location: In My Cave!!! Team: Halo GAMA
- Contact:
- -Legendary-
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 8:06 pm
- Location: SC
- Contact:
Make the aperture smaller and i'll like it a lot more. (If you were using something like f/1.5 or f/3.5 or so, I'd take it up to around f/8, too much more and you'll lose the nice DOF you have going)
As for everything else about it, I like it (nice and sharp, I can't stress how annoying an unintentionally out of focus picture is).
EDIT: Sorry you might not be able to do that with that camera, but i'd check. Too much talk about DSLR photography lately :/
As for everything else about it, I like it (nice and sharp, I can't stress how annoying an unintentionally out of focus picture is).
EDIT: Sorry you might not be able to do that with that camera, but i'd check. Too much talk about DSLR photography lately :/
- Lt Slap a ho
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 6:34 pm
Well about it being out of focus, I wanted it to be focused on his nose. And aperture?Kirk wrote:Make the aperture smaller and i'll like it a lot more. (If you were using something like f/1.5 or f/3.5 or so, I'd take it up to around f/8, too much more and you'll lose the nice DOF you have going)
As for everything else about it, I like it (nice and sharp, I can't stress how annoying an unintentionally out of focus picture is).
EDIT: Sorry you might not be able to do that with that camera, but i'd check. Too much talk about DSLR photography lately :/
Idk what that is, I just use a normal digital camera.
Got bored so I decided to take some pictures to explain myself in the simplest possible way:
Lower aperture (larger hole): More light comes in, more depth of field. Creates a cool little effect.
Higher aperture (smaller hole): Less light comes in, less depth of field, more of the picture is in focus.
And i wasn't saying the picture being out of focus was a problem, if you noticed I commended you for not having the picture out of focus like most peoples....
And the whole reason I brought up this aperture business was to explain that more of the dog could have been in focus, though I totally get that you wanted just the nose and not, say, the eyes. Though the aperture allows you, if you wanted it and couldn't get it normally, to have both the eyes and the nose. If you get what i'm saying.
Lower aperture (larger hole): More light comes in, more depth of field. Creates a cool little effect.
Higher aperture (smaller hole): Less light comes in, less depth of field, more of the picture is in focus.
And i wasn't saying the picture being out of focus was a problem, if you noticed I commended you for not having the picture out of focus like most peoples....
And the whole reason I brought up this aperture business was to explain that more of the dog could have been in focus, though I totally get that you wanted just the nose and not, say, the eyes. Though the aperture allows you, if you wanted it and couldn't get it normally, to have both the eyes and the nose. If you get what i'm saying.
- Lt Slap a ho
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 6:34 pm
Ok, thanks for clearing that up. I want to get more into photography, and I feel I need a camera that I can do more with (ex. aperture). Thank you for using pictures to explain it more as well. Glad to see someone on here knows alot about photography! =PKirk wrote:Got bored so I decided to take some pictures to explain myself in the simplest possible way:
Lower aperture (larger hole): More light comes in, more depth of field. Creates a cool little effect.
Higher aperture (smaller hole): Less light comes in, less depth of field, more of the picture is in focus.
And i wasn't saying the picture being out of focus was a problem, if you noticed I commended you for not having the picture out of focus like most peoples....
And the whole reason I brought up this aperture business was to explain that more of the dog could have been in focus, though I totally get that you wanted just the nose and not, say, the eyes. Though the aperture allows you, if you wanted it and couldn't get it normally, to have both the eyes and the nose. If you get what i'm saying.
Actually I don't
Just a little, got into it a couple months ago. I still can't afford the stuff I really want to do, but oh well.. (though I do have a friend that can answer questions whenever I have them, and my old A/V / Multimedia teacher is also a pretty pro photographer as well, so knows a ton)
Just a little, got into it a couple months ago. I still can't afford the stuff I really want to do, but oh well.. (though I do have a friend that can answer questions whenever I have them, and my old A/V / Multimedia teacher is also a pretty pro photographer as well, so knows a ton)