Page 1 of 1

Gah

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 8:05 pm
by GametagAeonFlux
I haven't made a sig in a while...can't say I exactly like how this one came out...but I might as well post it.

Image

I know, the top left sucks, etc etc.

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 8:07 pm
by Dr.Cox
I dont know if the render fits with the bg.

Strip the render. :)

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 8:11 pm
by GametagAeonFlux
Armed Civilian wrote:I dont know if the render fits with the bg.

Strip the render. :)
Unfortunately, I used a stock...so the background (even though it wasn't detailed or anything) is part of the signature's foundation so to speak. If I removed it, it would look really odd...like there would be transparent parts of the signature and stuff.

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 8:11 pm
by Sarb
GametagAeonFlux wrote:Too busy, too random, nothing flows, and the colors look nasty together. :?
You nailed it :wink:

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 8:12 pm
by Dr.Cox
Well if thats the Case Amazing Job :)

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 8:14 pm
by Sarb
Armed Civilian wrote:Well if thats the Case Amazing Job :)
Wait, I'm not sure what you mean, whats amazing?
Is this made of just one stock?

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 8:15 pm
by Dr.Cox
Everything besides the Army Dude. :)

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 8:19 pm
by GametagAeonFlux
Sarb wrote:
Armed Civilian wrote:Well if thats the Case Amazing Job :)
Wait, I'm not sure what you mean, whats amazing?
Is this made of just one stock?
The only stock used was the third image in this set. I'm sure by looking at that image, you can tell what little detail there was in the background.

The rest is a few effect C4Ds, lighting effects, gradient maps, photo filters, and a gaussian blur or two.

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 8:20 pm
by Sarb
Even though thats pretty cool, doesn't chnage the outcome, sorry I just don't like.

Is this like a one time thing? Posting the sig, or are you gonna start doing it more and more?

Edit: Neverind I though you used just the stock and modified only it to look like what it is now, but I was wrong.
So it's pretty much a normal sig.

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 8:22 pm
by GametagAeonFlux
Sarb wrote:Even though thats pretty cool, doesn't chnage the outcome, sorry I just don't like.
It's ok...it's the first sig I've made in about 8-9 months. I wasn't expecting anything good to come out of this. It was mainly just testing out what everything does.
Sarb wrote:Is this like a one time thing? Posting the sig, or are you gonna start doing it more and more?
I 'unno, it depends on how much free time I have.

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 9:19 pm
by noscottno
I think it'd look awsome as an abract sig if their wasn't a person.

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 9:49 pm
by GametagAeonFlux
As I said before...the main foundation of the background is from the stock...I'll try to do another one tomorrow and leave the character out of the stock. Thanks for the suggestions so far.

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 5:39 pm
by noscottno
GametagAeonFlux wrote:As I said before...the main foundation of the background is from the stock...I'll try to do another one tomorrow and leave the character out of the stock. Thanks for the suggestions so far.
Ok? That doesn't mean you can't put stuff over the guy/smudge him.

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 5:46 pm
by GametagAeonFlux
noscottno wrote:Ok? That doesn't mean you can't put stuff over the guy/smudge him.
I know, I'm just saying that I've already made the sig, and it's not just a "turn off this layer to take the guy out" thing. I'm done with it. :|

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 5:47 pm
by noscottno
GametagAeonFlux wrote:
noscottno wrote:Ok? That doesn't mean you can't put stuff over the guy/smudge him.
I know, I'm just saying that I've already made the sig, and it's not just a "turn off this layer to take the guy out" thing. I'm done with it. :|
Fair enough. I still like it.