HaloMods "Classic" Read-only Archive

Well everyone, not the best from the 1st signature which I used the best Billy Joe Blues stock that I could find. The stock I used of his had wash lights so that it shy it came out a bit strange in the end color wise on the right side. The 2nd consisted of all defaults just to see what can be done without changing any key things.

Green Day Sig


Oceana Sig

30, views. No replies. I am getting sick of how dead HaloMods is getting...

Stop bumping your own topics. One more time and you'll be given a temporary ban.

i have posted a simmalar thing befor...and that is that there is something about these that doesnt jump out and grap my attention...for the first one...i think it is how you used the colors.....the 2nd...welll...maby making the main disin more visible

1=6/10
2=6.5/10

DJ_Gnomey wrote:30, views. No replies. I am getting sick of how dead HaloMods is getting...

Either that, or people don't feel like commenting.

I don't like either. The first one, his face is really wierd and seems really stretched out. The second one has pretty much no other color.

The color was messed up on the greenday one and neither were stretched out or resized at all. I jsut cropped them into the sig template I had. And 42 views? That is jsut stupid that no one was replying...

First one: Render is distorted.

Second: No contrast.

i think the second one is a good start...but like he said...contrast...contrast would be very nice...

The second one I got bored and just was messing with C4D's which I almost never use. That is why i didn't add contrast. When I did it looked very sharp. The first one is actually not distorted at all. That must be your monitor or you must have never heard of a grunge sig.

Neither are very good.

The render in the first one is plain bad, and the overall look isn't very good.

The second one is just terrible. A blue background with two C4D's that you didn't make and text.

Try searching for tutorials on Google.

No, it's not my monitor, because JK mentioned that it was distorted as well.

1st: 0/10 because I hate Green Day.

2nd: 6/10 because the sig has no contrast .

EDIT: The render is distorted by the way.

http://www.omguide.com/images2/Concert_ ... _21_jb.jpg

Tell me hat is a distorted stock and I will kick your face in. I am viewing on a Sony Hi-Def Monitor. And ban me if I bump a topic like this again. I had 30 something views at the time and no one posted. I bet if you had common sense you would do that to your own topic too...

Sgt.Peppers wrote:1st: 0/10 because I hate Green Day.

EDIT: The render is distorted by the way.

Thanks for the constructive criticism there. Just because you hate Green Day doesn't mean it is a bad signature. FI it was something anti religious or anti semitic, then it would be a bad signature.

It's not distorted in the stock, but the way you blurred it or something probably distorted it. No matter, in the sig, the render is distorted

gh0570fchurch wrote:It's not distorted in the stock, but the way you blurred it or something probably distorted it. No matter, in the sig, the render is distorted

Did you one get the phrase I have used many a time in this topic, grunge???

Yes, I did. I've done grunge sigs before, and that doesn't mean that the render being distorted is any less bad.

DJ_Gnomey, it doesn't matter if what you did was common sense. It's against our rules.

And just because the signature is grunge does not mean the render should be distorted.

If you want to keep inciting arguments, I can lock this topic.

They both suck. I don't have to say why.

RaVNzCRoFT wrote:DJ_Gnomey, it doesn't matter if what you did was common sense. It's against our rules.

And just because the signature is grunge does not mean the render should be distorted.

If you want to keep inciting arguments, I can lock this topic.

Fine, if you will stop always agreeing with others even though I am right (in this topic yes, a good mod like Tural or Scotty or a few others would bypass the rule and enforce what other mayhem or disruptions to the topic others beside myself are causing.

noscottno wrote:They both suck. I don't have to say why.

Then I don't have to say why I reported your post!

Who am I agreeing with, and on what subject am I agreeing with anybody? What are you right about? A good staff member would bypass a rule to enforce another? You just have absolutely no idea as to what you're talking about. Rules are rules. And nobody in this topic is causing problems other than you. Stop taking criticisms so badly. If you don't want people giving your work criticism, then simply leave our forum. Good day, sir.

DJ_Gnomey... Learn how to take criticism. Yes, the first one is grunge, whatever. The render still looks bad. The second one has no contrast, and the one solid color makes it look bad. Is that so hard to swallow?

DJ_Gnomey, feel free to contact me on MSN, and I'll do what I can to help you with these. As long as you don't start flaming me, because I don't like the ones you've already posted. I've posted terrible sigs before, and people tell me that they're terrible and why they're terrible, and I learn to accept it. Maybe you should try the same. I do see some potential here, but if you want to have some forward progression in how good you are with Photoshop, you need to listen to others, not just block them out when they give you some constructive criticism.