Two New Panorama Sigs

Wanna show off your Sig/Avatar/artwork. Well this is the place to do it!
User avatar
DJ_Gnomey




Connoisseur

Posts: 490
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:31 am
Location: New York
Contact:

Two New Panorama Sigs

Post by DJ_Gnomey »

Well everyone, not the best from the 1st signature which I used the best Billy Joe Blues stock that I could find. The stock I used of his had wash lights so that it shy it came out a bit strange in the end color wise on the right side. The 2nd consisted of all defaults just to see what can be done without changing any key things.

Green Day Sig
Image

Oceana Sig
Image
Image
User avatar
DJ_Gnomey




Connoisseur

Posts: 490
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:31 am
Location: New York
Contact:

Post by DJ_Gnomey »

30, views. No replies. I am getting sick of how dead HaloMods is getting...

Stop bumping your own topics. One more time and you'll be given a temporary ban.
Image
User avatar
youhoo7





Posts: 1021
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 2:53 pm

Post by youhoo7 »

i have posted a simmalar thing befor...and that is that there is something about these that doesnt jump out and grap my attention...for the first one...i think it is how you used the colors.....the 2nd...welll...maby making the main disin more visible

1=6/10
2=6.5/10
Image
We
User avatar
JK-47




Bloodhound Pyre Socialist Grunge

Posts: 10883
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 2:54 pm
Location: Utah

Post by JK-47 »

DJ_Gnomey wrote:30, views. No replies. I am getting sick of how dead HaloMods is getting...
Either that, or people don't feel like commenting.

I don't like either. The first one, his face is really wierd and seems really stretched out. The second one has pretty much no other color.
Image
User avatar
DJ_Gnomey




Connoisseur

Posts: 490
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:31 am
Location: New York
Contact:

Post by DJ_Gnomey »

The color was messed up on the greenday one and neither were stretched out or resized at all. I jsut cropped them into the sig template I had. And 42 views? That is jsut stupid that no one was replying...
Image
User avatar
gh0570fchurch




Snitch!

Posts: 3374
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 11:04 am
Location: San Diego Area, CA
Contact:

Post by gh0570fchurch »

First one: Render is distorted.

Second: No contrast. :|
Image
Dr.Cox wrote:gh0570fchurch has a mexi-stash. =D
User avatar
youhoo7





Posts: 1021
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 2:53 pm

Post by youhoo7 »

i think the second one is a good start...but like he said...contrast...contrast would be very nice...
Image
We
User avatar
DJ_Gnomey




Connoisseur

Posts: 490
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:31 am
Location: New York
Contact:

Post by DJ_Gnomey »

The second one I got bored and just was messing with C4D's which I almost never use. That is why i didn't add contrast. When I did it looked very sharp. The first one is actually not distorted at all. That must be your monitor or you must have never heard of a grunge sig.
Image
User avatar
RaVNzCRoFT




Grunge Pyre

Posts: 6208
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 3:05 pm
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina, USA

Post by RaVNzCRoFT »

Neither are very good.

The render in the first one is plain bad, and the overall look isn't very good.

The second one is just terrible. A blue background with two C4D's that you didn't make and text. :|

Try searching for tutorials on Google.
User avatar
gh0570fchurch




Snitch!

Posts: 3374
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 11:04 am
Location: San Diego Area, CA
Contact:

Post by gh0570fchurch »

No, it's not my monitor, because JK mentioned that it was distorted as well.
Image
Dr.Cox wrote:gh0570fchurch has a mexi-stash. =D
User avatar
Sgt.Peppers




Snitch! Connoisseur

Posts: 2277
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 1:25 pm
Location: Texas

Post by Sgt.Peppers »

1st: 0/10 because I hate Green Day.

2nd: 6/10 because the sig has no contrast :?.

EDIT: The render is distorted by the way.
User avatar
DJ_Gnomey




Connoisseur

Posts: 490
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:31 am
Location: New York
Contact:

Post by DJ_Gnomey »

http://www.omguide.com/images2/Concert_ ... _21_jb.jpg

Tell me hat is a distorted stock and I will kick your face in. I am viewing on a Sony Hi-Def Monitor. And ban me if I bump a topic like this again. I had 30 something views at the time and no one posted. I bet if you had common sense you would do that to your own topic too...
Sgt.Peppers wrote:1st: 0/10 because I hate Green Day.

EDIT: The render is distorted by the way.
Thanks for the constructive criticism there. Just because you hate Green Day doesn't mean it is a bad signature. FI it was something anti religious or anti semitic, then it would be a bad signature.
Image
User avatar
gh0570fchurch




Snitch!

Posts: 3374
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 11:04 am
Location: San Diego Area, CA
Contact:

Post by gh0570fchurch »

It's not distorted in the stock, but the way you blurred it or something probably distorted it. No matter, in the sig, the render is distorted
Image
Dr.Cox wrote:gh0570fchurch has a mexi-stash. =D
User avatar
DJ_Gnomey




Connoisseur

Posts: 490
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:31 am
Location: New York
Contact:

Post by DJ_Gnomey »

gh0570fchurch wrote:It's not distorted in the stock, but the way you blurred it or something probably distorted it. No matter, in the sig, the render is distorted

Did you one get the phrase I have used many a time in this topic, grunge???
Image
User avatar
gh0570fchurch




Snitch!

Posts: 3374
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 11:04 am
Location: San Diego Area, CA
Contact:

Post by gh0570fchurch »

Yes, I did. I've done grunge sigs before, and that doesn't mean that the render being distorted is any less bad.
Image
Dr.Cox wrote:gh0570fchurch has a mexi-stash. =D
User avatar
RaVNzCRoFT




Grunge Pyre

Posts: 6208
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 3:05 pm
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina, USA

Post by RaVNzCRoFT »

DJ_Gnomey, it doesn't matter if what you did was common sense. It's against our rules.

And just because the signature is grunge does not mean the render should be distorted.

If you want to keep inciting arguments, I can lock this topic.
User avatar
noscottno




Orb Snitch! Mad Hatter Commentator

Posts: 2175
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 7:33 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Post by noscottno »

They both suck. I don't have to say why.
User avatar
DJ_Gnomey




Connoisseur

Posts: 490
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:31 am
Location: New York
Contact:

Post by DJ_Gnomey »

RaVNzCRoFT wrote:DJ_Gnomey, it doesn't matter if what you did was common sense. It's against our rules.

And just because the signature is grunge does not mean the render should be distorted.

If you want to keep inciting arguments, I can lock this topic.
Fine, if you will stop always agreeing with others even though I am right (in this topic yes, a good mod like Tural or Scotty or a few others would bypass the rule and enforce what other mayhem or disruptions to the topic others beside myself are causing.
noscottno wrote:They both suck. I don't have to say why.
Then I don't have to say why I reported your post! :)

Who am I agreeing with, and on what subject am I agreeing with anybody? What are you right about? A good staff member would bypass a rule to enforce another? You just have absolutely no idea as to what you're talking about. Rules are rules. And nobody in this topic is causing problems other than you. Stop taking criticisms so badly. If you don't want people giving your work criticism, then simply leave our forum. Good day, sir.
Image
User avatar
JK-47




Bloodhound Pyre Socialist Grunge

Posts: 10883
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 2:54 pm
Location: Utah

Post by JK-47 »

DJ_Gnomey... Learn how to take criticism. Yes, the first one is grunge, whatever. The render still looks bad. The second one has no contrast, and the one solid color makes it look bad. Is that so hard to swallow?
Image
User avatar
gh0570fchurch




Snitch!

Posts: 3374
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 11:04 am
Location: San Diego Area, CA
Contact:

Post by gh0570fchurch »

DJ_Gnomey, feel free to contact me on MSN, and I'll do what I can to help you with these. As long as you don't start flaming me, because I don't like the ones you've already posted. I've posted terrible sigs before, and people tell me that they're terrible and why they're terrible, and I learn to accept it. Maybe you should try the same. I do see some potential here, but if you want to have some forward progression in how good you are with Photoshop, you need to listen to others, not just block them out when they give you some constructive criticism.
Image
Dr.Cox wrote:gh0570fchurch has a mexi-stash. =D
Locked