Page 1 of 1
=/ This is rather new
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:45 pm
by McFarlane
A new tag (forgot to post it in this site)
And this dude turned my tags into tutorials :o
http://www.gamerenders.com/forum/index. ... pic=240792
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 3:06 pm
by xXxCocoFangxXx
They all kinda look the same.
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 3:18 pm
by Grunt Rebel
Ive seen it on GR.
Looks quite nice to me! I will be sure to check them tuts as well!
Im looking to buy #3 the most.
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 7:36 am
by gh0570fchurch
Get a new style.
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 9:27 am
by McFarlane
gh0570fchurch wrote:Get a new style.
No
You don't have the right to command me to do anything.
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 9:33 am
by gh0570fchurch
I was just joking, but seriously; the style is getting old
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 9:44 am
by McFarlane
gh0570fchurch wrote:I was just joking, but seriously; the style is getting old
When I tried a different style, and I did it just for the people who were complaining here, you guys were still complaining.
So why do I bother trying?
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 9:49 am
by xXxCocoFangxXx
No need to get mad, it's just constructive criticism. I have no problem with your style.
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 9:52 am
by gh0570fchurch
McFarlane, I'm just trying to help. Whenever I try a new style, the first time I do it, it doesn't turn out too well when I try posting it. Don't take it negatively. Just do what people suggest, and you will get better. Also, don't stick too closely to tutorials.
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 10:21 am
by wes
gh0570fchurch wrote:Also, don't stick too closely to tutorials.
wtf?
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 10:23 am
by gh0570fchurch
Hey, it's the most common mistake that people make with sigs.
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 10:40 am
by wes
i didn't know that this sig was the outcome of a tutorial
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 10:55 am
by The_Hushed_Casket
As much as I hate to toot McFarlane's horn, I highly doubt he uses tutorials anymore.
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 11:12 am
by wes
The_Hushed_Casket wrote:As much as I hate to toot McFarlane's horn, I highly doubt he uses tutorials anymore.
yeah. and in his post at the top of this topic, he says that someone else is using his "tags" to make tutorials out of
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 11:19 am
by Sandman
It does look the same as everything else.. and honestly.. it doesn't look very hard to make..
Just a C4D render effect or two.. brushing.. and text.. (mebbe a lightsource at the top if that isn't part of an effect)
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:46 pm
by McFarlane
Sandman wrote:It does look the same as everything else.. and honestly.. it doesn't look very hard to make..
Just a C4D render effect or two.. brushing.. and text.. (mebbe a lightsource at the top if that isn't part of an effect)
I'm not going to annoy myself with it.
It is very hard to make, this tag took an hour.
And it's okay, it's just that the same comment gets irritating after a while.
And to answer your questions:
No, I don't use tutorials, I said that some guy made a tutorial using my tags.
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 2:22 pm
by Sandman
I'm not trying to insult you or anything.. I just don't see how that could take an hour.. if I had that effect pack I could prolly make it in a couple of minutes.. again, no offense.. I'm just pointing it out
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 9:12 am
by RaVNzCRoFT
Sandman wrote:I'm not trying to insult you or anything.. I just don't see how that could take an hour.. if I had that effect pack I could prolly make it in a couple of minutes.. again, no offense.. I'm just pointing it out
There is more to the signature that meets the eye. No offense, but you couldn't make it in a couple of minutes. Not the same way McFarlane did.