=/ This is rather new

McFarlane · Post by **McFarlane** » Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:45 pm

A new tag (forgot to post it in this site)

And this dude turned my tags into tutorials :o
http://www.gamerenders.com/forum/index. ... pic=240792

xXxCocoFangxXx · Post by **xXxCocoFangxXx** » Sun Jul 02, 2006 3:06 pm

They all kinda look the same.

Grunt Rebel · Post by **Grunt Rebel** » Sun Jul 02, 2006 3:18 pm

Ive seen it on GR.

Looks quite nice to me! I will be sure to check them tuts as well!

Im looking to buy #3 the most.

gh0570fchurch · Post by **gh0570fchurch** » Mon Jul 03, 2006 7:36 am

Get a new style.

McFarlane · Post by **McFarlane** » Mon Jul 03, 2006 9:27 am

gh0570fchurch wrote:Get a new style.

No
You don't have the right to command me to do anything.

gh0570fchurch · Post by **gh0570fchurch** » Mon Jul 03, 2006 9:33 am

I was just joking, but seriously; the style is getting old

McFarlane · Post by **McFarlane** » Mon Jul 03, 2006 9:44 am

gh0570fchurch wrote:I was just joking, but seriously; the style is getting old

When I tried a different style, and I did it just for the people who were complaining here, you guys were still complaining.
So why do I bother trying?

xXxCocoFangxXx · Post by **xXxCocoFangxXx** » Mon Jul 03, 2006 9:49 am

No need to get mad, it's just constructive criticism. I have no problem with your style.

gh0570fchurch · Post by **gh0570fchurch** » Mon Jul 03, 2006 9:52 am

McFarlane, I'm just trying to help. Whenever I try a new style, the first time I do it, it doesn't turn out too well when I try posting it. Don't take it negatively. Just do what people suggest, and you will get better. Also, don't stick too closely to tutorials.

wes · Post by **wes** » Mon Jul 03, 2006 10:21 am

gh0570fchurch wrote:Also, don't stick too closely to tutorials.

wtf?

gh0570fchurch · Post by **gh0570fchurch** » Mon Jul 03, 2006 10:23 am

Hey, it's the most common mistake that people make with sigs.

wes · Post by **wes** » Mon Jul 03, 2006 10:40 am

i didn't know that this sig was the outcome of a tutorial

The_Hushed_Casket · Post by **The_Hushed_Casket** » Mon Jul 03, 2006 10:55 am

As much as I hate to toot McFarlane's horn, I highly doubt he uses tutorials anymore.

wes · Post by **wes** » Mon Jul 03, 2006 11:12 am

The_Hushed_Casket wrote:As much as I hate to toot McFarlane's horn, I highly doubt he uses tutorials anymore.

yeah. and in his post at the top of this topic, he says that someone else is using his "tags" to make tutorials out of

Sandman · Post by **Sandman** » Mon Jul 03, 2006 11:19 am

It does look the same as everything else.. and honestly.. it doesn't look very hard to make..

Just a C4D render effect or two.. brushing.. and text.. (mebbe a lightsource at the top if that isn't part of an effect)

McFarlane · Post by **McFarlane** » Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:46 pm

Sandman wrote:It does look the same as everything else.. and honestly.. it doesn't look very hard to make..

Just a C4D render effect or two.. brushing.. and text.. (mebbe a lightsource at the top if that isn't part of an effect)

I'm not going to annoy myself with it.
It is very hard to make, this tag took an hour.

And it's okay, it's just that the same comment gets irritating after a while.

And to answer your questions:
No, I don't use tutorials, I said that some guy made a tutorial using my tags.

Sandman · Post by **Sandman** » Mon Jul 03, 2006 2:22 pm

I'm not trying to insult you or anything.. I just don't see how that could take an hour.. if I had that effect pack I could prolly make it in a couple of minutes.. again, no offense.. I'm just pointing it out

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Wed Jul 05, 2006 9:12 am

Sandman wrote:I'm not trying to insult you or anything.. I just don't see how that could take an hour.. if I had that effect pack I could prolly make it in a couple of minutes.. again, no offense.. I'm just pointing it out

There is more to the signature that meets the eye. No offense, but you couldn't make it in a couple of minutes. Not the same way McFarlane did.