HaloMods "Classic" Read-only Archive

I think this is probably one of my better ones. I know, the text sucks. You don't have to tell me.


Edit: Yes, I know it is over the max file size. I wasn't planning on currenting it.

HAha the text sucks


but its good

I love it all except for the text.

[quote="maca_

Rallos wrote:I think this is probably one of my better ones. I know, the text sucks. You don't have to tell me.


Edit: Yes, I know it is over the max file size. I wasn't planning on currenting it.

well, now that you got that out of your system, you can stop for a while...

nah, j/k. The text does look a bit off.

the text doesnt fit the style of the text... other than that, the sig looks good, even if it is hard to tell what it is.

wtf r u guys doing he said he knows the text sux and not to tell him about it and even if i dont think he needs to here it from like 80 ppl i dont like it that much i dont know y too bland mb? oh well

The text effects aren't bad, but the font doesn't fit. Find a font that matches the grunge-abstract background, and you'll be fine. The opacity of the text is good because it shows the colors. I like everything else, also.

Meh..too lazy to change it.

I just ended up making something else >_>

I never have been good at text...

Sweet.

the text could use some work, Id lose the outline and try to blend it differently.

Why does everyone give 70% more about text? Whenever i see critisizm its like it it would be 10/10 but the text sucks so im going to give it a 5/10. It takes about 5 seconds to put on text and give it an effect to make it look like its on there properly, but it takes about 10-50 minutes to make the actuall sig. Pay attention to work rather than text sometime. Thats like saying Vincent Vangough was a terrible artist because his handwriting sucked.

Nice sigs Rallos, 10/10 on both.

multi-genre wrote:Why does everyone give 70% more about text? Whenever i see critisizm its like it it would be 10/10 but the text sucks so im going to give it a 5/10. It takes about 5 seconds to put on text and give it an effect to make it look like its on there properly, but it takes about 10-50 minutes to make the actuall sig. Pay attention to work rather than text sometime. Thats like saying Vincent Vangough was a terrible artist because his handwriting sucked.

Nice sigs Rallos, 10/10 on both.

Since the rest of the sig is really good, I comment on the parts that need work. In this case its the text.

multi-genre wrote:Why does everyone give 70% more about text? Whenever i see critisizm its like it it would be 10/10 but the text sucks so im going to give it a 5/10. It takes about 5 seconds to put on text and give it an effect to make it look like its on there properly, but it takes about 10-50 minutes to make the actuall sig. Pay attention to work rather than text sometime. Thats like saying Vincent Vangough was a terrible artist because his handwriting sucked.

Nice sigs Rallos, 10/10 on both.

hes got a good point serouisly its good to care about text but i think some people care way too much about the text and they forget that this is artwork not a text competition i think text deserves about a points worth on a scale two at most but definitlely no more

The text is better, but the border is not. Since some areas of the signature touch the white skin, the overlayed border does not show. You should just make the border black, so none of those white parts on the edges blend with the forum skin.

RaVNzCRoFT wrote:The text is better, but the border is not. Since some areas of the signature touch the white skin, the overlayed border does not show. You should just make the border black, so none of those white parts on the edges blend with the forum skin.

Done

then tubes remind me of a Hair viewed through an Electron Microscope.

lol, it does look like hair

Wow, Rallos has a lot of dandruf in there too

Dos Mes wrote:Wow, Rallos has a lot of dandruf in there too

And my head is exploding >_>

Much better with that border.