Page 1 of 1
meh...
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 5:43 pm
by fourn443
well i think it looks like crap
(yes its supposed to look pixeleted) but what do u guys think

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 5:49 pm
by Cuda
I dont understand, why would you purposly try to make a crappy sig?
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 5:52 pm
by fourn443
well, i didnt mean to make it crappy i try following tutorials for good ideas and then i saw this and i thought it would be easy but when i tried it i coudnt figure out 1 step so i sorta improvised on that and it turns out that was basically the whole sigs detail lol
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 5:52 pm
by BEEF!!!
Ouch.
But don't use filters on your sig like that man. Looks terrible.
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 5:56 pm
by fourn443
i only used the sharpen like the tu... actually i did go a bit overboard witht eh sharpen lol sorry
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 6:00 pm
by maca_ยง
Lower the sharpen and it will most likely improve.
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 10:17 pm
by wes
too pixelated for me to like dude
at least you experimented around
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 11:08 am
by lxNicktardxl
wes wrote:too pixelated for me to like dude
at least you experimented around
True! But stop using that font, it looked good the first 2 times.

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 12:15 pm
by RaVNzCRoFT
The intense sharpening and the contrast kill it.

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 12:32 pm
by fourn443
lxNicktardxl wrote:wes wrote:too pixelated for me to like dude
at least you experimented around
True! But stop using that font, it looked good the first 2 times.

i only use it when im definitely not gunna current, only when im testing tutorials. except for the first couple times i used it