meh...

fourn443 · Post by **fourn443** » Mon Feb 13, 2006 5:43 pm

well i think it looks like crap (yes its supposed to look pixeleted) but what do u guys think

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Mon Feb 13, 2006 5:49 pm

I dont understand, why would you purposly try to make a crappy sig?

fourn443 · Post by **fourn443** » Mon Feb 13, 2006 5:52 pm

well, i didnt mean to make it crappy i try following tutorials for good ideas and then i saw this and i thought it would be easy but when i tried it i coudnt figure out 1 step so i sorta improvised on that and it turns out that was basically the whole sigs detail lol

BEEF!!! · Post by **BEEF!!!** » Mon Feb 13, 2006 5:52 pm

Ouch.
But don't use filters on your sig like that man. Looks terrible.

fourn443 · Post by **fourn443** » Mon Feb 13, 2006 5:56 pm

i only used the sharpen like the tu... actually i did go a bit overboard witht eh sharpen lol sorry

maca_§ · Post by **maca_§** » Mon Feb 13, 2006 6:00 pm

Lower the sharpen and it will most likely improve.

wes · Post by **wes** » Mon Feb 13, 2006 10:17 pm

too pixelated for me to like dude

at least you experimented around

lxNicktardxl · Post by **lxNicktardxl** » Tue Feb 14, 2006 11:08 am

wes wrote:too pixelated for me to like dude
at least you experimented around

True! But stop using that font, it looked good the first 2 times.

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Tue Feb 14, 2006 12:15 pm

The intense sharpening and the contrast kill it.

fourn443 · Post by **fourn443** » Tue Feb 14, 2006 12:32 pm

lxNicktardxl wrote:
wes wrote:too pixelated for me to like dude
at least you experimented around
True! But stop using that font, it looked good the first 2 times.

i only use it when im definitely not gunna current, only when im testing tutorials. except for the first couple times i used it