Page 1 of 1
which one?
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 12:46 pm
by fourn44
which should i use as my sig?

or

if the second one, im going to add text
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:01 pm
by Dr.Cox
to be honest the both really not that great.... so neither
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:25 pm
by RaVNzCRoFT
Second because the brushing is better. But to recolor it, give it a gradient instead of a color balance. The color change right now is too harsh.
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:33 pm
by Ombre
Use the second one, but cropt it so its 350x120 its to long right now, I dont think any sigs need to be 500 pixels wide, after 400 it usually looks horrible.
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:55 pm
by BEEF!!!
Niether. They both exceed 75 KB
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:09 pm
by RaVNzCRoFT
Ouch, Beef, that hurt.

Yeah fourn, if you're going to use them here, compress them.
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 7:18 pm
by maca_ยง
Compress/use the second.
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 7:33 pm
by Patrickssj6
Go to vivd=no compress no resize.Yeah take the lower one but use Gradient

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 7:44 pm
by Cuda
the detail's great but the colors look like Peanut Butter & Jellydropped in Dirt.
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 10:13 am
by BFIGHTER
Kinda seems like too much is going on.