Testofskill's Signature Gallery

Grunt Rebel · Post by **Grunt Rebel** » Wed May 31, 2006 2:51 am

I would like to see more of the background. Maybe make the dragon smaller.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Wed May 31, 2006 1:43 pm

testofskill wrote:cool

huh?

save it as a PNG and check "Transparent"(should be by default, but Just in Case....)

testofskill · Post by **testofskill** » Wed May 31, 2006 7:18 pm

ok here, i saved as a PNG

It works, Thankyou

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Wed May 31, 2006 7:23 pm

Kinda looks like youre basicly using the render as your sig, and the background is barely visible.

testofskill · Post by **testofskill** » Wed May 31, 2006 7:38 pm

both were the same!

Heres another

gh0570fchurch · Post by **gh0570fchurch** » Wed May 31, 2006 7:48 pm

testofskill wrote:both were the same!

the sig looks great, but way too big to be used

testofskill · Post by **testofskill** » Wed May 31, 2006 8:00 pm

oh ya i know theyre too big, but theyre still sigs.

Heres one more

wes · Post by **wes** » Wed May 31, 2006 8:05 pm

stop making them too big, 'cause then they have too much dead space

testofskill · Post by **testofskill** » Wed May 31, 2006 8:30 pm

Ok heres one thatsnot so big.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Wed May 31, 2006 9:00 pm

the newest two, the colored brushing is just an eyesore. just very bad color choices. If you want multi-colored sig backgrounds, do it over a gradient. and keep the brushes black or white.

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Thu Jun 01, 2006 12:59 pm

Actually, the following image proves that the second signature is larger than the first, in square pixels.

Use a smaller canvas size. Try 300x110.

Patrickssj6 · Post by **Patrickssj6** » Thu Jun 01, 2006 1:20 pm

T'ownzored

testofskill · Post by **testofskill** » Thu Jun 01, 2006 2:42 pm

ya, but when you change the canvas size, it crops the image.

FleetAdmiralBacon · Post by **FleetAdmiralBacon** » Thu Jun 01, 2006 2:45 pm

RaVNzCRoFT wrote:Actually, the following image proves that the second signature is larger than the first, in square pixels.

[image]

Use a smaller canvas size. Try 300x110.

Btw, it isn't px^2, it's just Pixels, they are not a unit of measuremet in that sort of way..

testofskill · Post by **testofskill** » Thu Jun 01, 2006 3:42 pm

Ok heres Two More

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Thu Jun 01, 2006 5:04 pm

testofskill wrote:ya, but when you change the canvas size, it crops the image.

hes saying that start with a smaller canvas. they dont always have to be at the limit. Like mine are now usually 300X100.

Grunt Rebel · Post by **Grunt Rebel** » Thu Jun 01, 2006 6:26 pm

300x110

Thats the size i use and its very effective.

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Thu Jun 01, 2006 6:53 pm

FleetAdmiralBacon wrote:
RaVNzCRoFT wrote:Actually, the following image proves that the second signature is larger than the first, in square pixels.

[image]

Use a smaller canvas size. Try 300x110.
Btw, it isn't px^2, it's just Pixels, they are not a unit of measuremet in that sort of way..

Actually, yes, it is square pixels. When finding the area of any figure, the units are squared.

testofskill · Post by **testofskill** » Fri Jun 02, 2006 3:22 pm

Ok but what do you think of the last two sigs?

Doctor · Post by **Doctor** » Fri Jun 02, 2006 3:32 pm

Much better! Finally, now scan lines on the render