Just a quick edit; I liked the results.
Scarab
-
Ketchup_Bomb
- Posts: 3374
- Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 7:52 pm
- Location: ¯\ ( º _ o ) /¯
- Contact:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
INSANEdrive
- Posts: 2642
- Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 1:42 pm
- Location: Cell Block #Q (There are a lot of strange people in the world. I should know; I'm three of them...)
- Contact:
|
|
Re: Scarab
JK-47, not Sarb.Ketchup_Bomb wrote:He'sa chargin' his lazer.
gg, Sarb. gg.
"You know what I'd like to be? I mean if I had my goddamn choice, I'd just be the catcher in the rye and all."
or should I?
Re: Scarab
I made the same mistake at first =P I saw "Scarab" and though "Sarb".INSANEdrive wrote:JK-47, not Sarb.Ketchup_Bomb wrote:gg, Sarb. gg.
Good job on the sig, the bars on the top and bottom could blend a bit better but its pretty good.
-
mxrider108
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 6:39 pm
- Location: Cary, NC
- Contact:
|
|
Re: Scarab
Nice, but I think it would look better with a little more width.
Re: Scarab
Ketchup_Bomb wrote:He'sa chargin' his lazer.
gg, Sarb. gg.
gg, Ketchup, gg.INSANEdrive wrote:
JK-47, not Sarb.
Thanks anyways :p
There was too much empty space that I wasn't happy with, so I cropped it out.mxrider108 wrote:Nice, but I think it would look better with a little more width.
Re: Scarab
it's very blurry, and with the black background and the deep shadowing, at first, it was very hard to make out what it was.
Re: Scarab
Gaussian blur is probably at fault for that. Here's the sig without it:
I've never really used it before, so I decided to experiment a bit.
I've never really used it before, so I decided to experiment a bit.
Re: Scarab
I like it a lot both ways. Maybe a happy medium? It's a good sig-worthy shot either way. Nice.
-
diamondbackk60
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: BFE North Dakota heh..
- Contact:
