Rate My Current

[TS] · Post by **[TS]** » Wed Jan 04, 2006 7:12 pm

Rate my current sig -/10.

wes · Post by **wes** » Wed Jan 04, 2006 7:21 pm

9.5/10

i like how u made the "TS" look like a scar

[TS] · Post by **[TS]** » Wed Jan 04, 2006 7:23 pm

Thanks.

maca_§ · Post by **maca_§** » Wed Jan 04, 2006 8:44 pm

Yeah, that TS scar is great, you did that very well.
Other then that it's alright, I'd say about 7/10.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Wed Jan 04, 2006 10:43 pm

at least no white haze. but why so small?

[TS] · Post by **[TS]** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:51 am

Because I think small sigs are good...

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 5:50 am

c'mon, make a 400X120....

[TS] · Post by **[TS]** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 5:52 am

...Why?

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 5:57 am

more space to work with, so its not all crammed up in such a tiny spcae.

[TS] · Post by **[TS]** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 5:58 am

I think larger sigs have more "empty space" than smaller sigs, imo...

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 6:00 am

pleeeeease??? We Got Infern0 in the UF for tiny sigs.

[TS] · Post by **[TS]** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 6:01 am

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 6:11 am

UF=User's Forum.

its where you're posting right now

[TS] · Post by **[TS]** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 6:12 am

Oh, lol. Well, I like small sigs, let's just leave it at that.

wes · Post by **wes** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 10:46 am

[TS] wrote:Because I think small sigs are good...

so do i, even tho i dont make small sigs (which i should be doing)

lxNicktardxl · Post by **lxNicktardxl** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:10 am

I dont make small sigs but this one looks good! It's kind of plain but the TS is a VERY good touch. Nice job 7.5/10

Phosphorous · Post by **Phosphorous** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 12:03 pm

The max size a sig should be is 400x120. I like to use 400x100. If you make them too big they look noobish.

Nice sig, I like it.