new image manipulation

fourn44 · Post by **fourn44** » Tue Nov 22, 2005 4:41 pm

lol it looks nothing like the pic **

wes · Post by **wes** » Tue Nov 22, 2005 4:47 pm

post original image mb?

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Tue Nov 22, 2005 4:50 pm

I don't see anything to be manipped...I mean...what is it???

fourn44 · Post by **fourn44** » Tue Nov 22, 2005 4:52 pm

oops sorry here:

i took a small section in the center left corner

CtrlAltDestroy · Post by **CtrlAltDestroy** » Tue Nov 22, 2005 5:01 pm

Well, it's not really a manip if we can't see what it is.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Tue Nov 22, 2005 5:04 pm

no offence but the "Maniped" pic looks like a dog turd after someone stepped in it and slid a little bit.

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Tue Nov 22, 2005 6:13 pm

You should know what a manip is before you post one. That's DEFINITELY not a manip.

maca_§ · Post by **maca_§** » Tue Nov 22, 2005 7:14 pm

Well technically it is, Ravnz, he took a bit of a pic and maniped it the extreme where it doesn't really look like it anymore.
lol.

Anywho, maybe you should make it more clear, fourn44.

RaVNzCRoFT · Post by **RaVNzCRoFT** » Wed Nov 23, 2005 4:38 am

It looks like he took a part of the image, brushed over it, gave it some color, and instead of setting it to Overlay, set it to Darken. lol

babelfish · Post by **babelfish** » Wed Nov 23, 2005 5:45 am

RaVNzCRoFT wrote: instead of setting it to Overlay, set it to Darken. lol

He wasn't supposed to do it the "right" way. That's what makes it different.
But Cuda makes a very strong point.

fourn44 · Post by **fourn44** » Wed Nov 23, 2005 10:02 am

actually i didnt do any brushing i just used a lot of filters and its a small section in the left of the pic