[vehicle]3 marines in warthog w/ no faces
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 4:30 pm
Visit remnantmods.com for more information
http://www.halomods.info/
No it isn't. If the forum rules say you need a prefix in a section, there are no excuses.SHOUTrvb wrote:it's the picture section and he very clearly stated what the pic was about in the topic. It's almost pointless to give a prefix to a picture. [picture] (no frickin duh) Topic name. It's ok
You kinda contradicted yourself there...just a little bit.Kirk wrote: No it isn't. If the forum rules say you need a prefix in a section, there are no excuses.
However, prefixes aren't really required in this section, so it's fine not to have one.
GametagAeonFlux wrote:Topic needs a prefix.
Kirk wrote:Yeah, prefixes in the Pictures section aren't really worthwile like they are in the other downloads section. You don't really need to use them unless you want to (now).
Hey warlord...how about next time you actually quote what the person said instead of making stuff up and not representing the person's actual words?=sw=warlord wrote:GametagAeonFlux wrote:Topic needs a prefix.Kirk wrote:Yeah, prefixes in the Pictures section aren't really worthwile like they are in the other downloads section. You don't really need to use them unless you want to (now).
Kirk wrote:No it isn't. If the forum rules say you need a prefix in a section, there are no excuses.
However, prefixes aren't really required in this section, so it's fine not to have one.
http://files.halomods.com/viewtopic.php?t=44243GametagAeonFlux wrote:
Hey warlord...how about next time you actually quote what the person said instead of making stuff up and not representing the person's actual words?
Don't flame homie. You quoted something from another topic and expect me to know that?=sw=warlord wrote:http://files.halomods.com/viewtopic.php?t=44243GametagAeonFlux wrote:
Hey warlord...how about next time you actually quote what the person said instead of making stuff up and not representing the person's actual words?
dumbass
How about getting your facts straight before you jump on warlord.GametagAeonFlux wrote: Hey warlord...how about next time you actually quote what the person said instead of making stuff up and not representing the person's actual words?
Your Post isn't Helping sarbjit...and Has the potentail for a forest fire.sarbjit wrote:How about getting your facts straight before you jump on warlord.GametagAeonFlux wrote: Hey warlord...how about next time you actually quote what the person said instead of making stuff up and not representing the person's actual words?
thats an unusual pic why don't they have faces?
I just want to know what is up those skins...ewwwGametagAeonFlux wrote: You quoted something from another topic and expect me to know that?![]()
Just to stay on topic...what's the blue stuff all over the Hog? lol
lol dont worry no ones going to loose any sleep on it lol.sarbjit wrote:Oh sorry flux posted while I was so i didn't see his post sorry bout that. I don't want to start anything.
My bad Kirk, I was just going off what you said in that topic on the picture prefixes. Oh well, he got it up. Looks....interesting, I'de hate to be them...Kirk wrote:No it isn't. If the forum rules say you need a prefix in a section, there are no excuses.SHOUTrvb wrote:it's the picture section and he very clearly stated what the pic was about in the topic. It's almost pointless to give a prefix to a picture. [picture] (no frickin duh) Topic name. It's ok
However, prefixes aren't really required in this section, so it's fine not to have one.