Page 2 of 2

Re: Raising Water Level

Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 2:35 pm
by ImpactPro
The thin layer of water on the bottom *there is water down there where the ice is, the ice is BSP and water is something else (scenery maybe) because we have glitched down there. So it should be spawnable

Re: Raising Water Level

Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 4:18 am
by Rogue_Modder
i promiced, i delivered:

Image

Image

Image


**Thanks to yellowyoiker of IBotModz for the flodding.**

Re: Raising Water Level

Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:47 pm
by Eaton
Looks more like a layer of blue ice. :P

Re: Raising Water Level

Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:00 am
by JIME01
LOL.
Rouge Modder, That mod is ambi0's not yours.

Re: Raising Water Level

Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:39 am
by Rogue_Modder
1) i didn't say it was mine:
**Thanks to yellowyoiker of IBotModz for the flodding.**
2) it wasn't ambi0's. it was yellowyokier.

Re: Raising Water Level

Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 3:00 pm
by JIME01
2) it wasn't ambi0's. it was yellowyokier.
Ambi0 showed that to the public around 1 year ago, I have been around Modding Halo 3 for a a long time now.

Re: Raising Water Level

Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 3:08 pm
by Tural
Interesting, seeing as how it would be entirely impossible to show that particular modification one year ago.
In addition, what does that have to do with anything? It's possible for two people to make the same thing, especially such a trivial concept. Who showed it first really doesn't matter, and the arrogance is unnecessary and you won't gain anything from this argument. This entire argument is pointless and is doing nothing but causing problems. Both of you need to drop it.

Re: Raising Water Level

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 9:27 am
by Rogue_Modder
what argument? i didn't even argue back. :)

Re: Raising Water Level

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:59 am
by Tural
Why are you bringing up a week-and-a-half old statement? Just let it be dead so we don't have to argue anymore. Since you want to though, yes, you did participate in the argument. You told him he was wrong about the creator, that is a directly reply to his argument...