HaloMods "Classic" Read-only Archive

Ok in my opinion, i think that we sould be able to have sig animations, if the sig is under the KB file size limit, i mean come on, its just an animation.

do you agree that there should be animations if the sig is under the KB file size limit.

It really doesnt matter to me. I like sigs how they are now.

i think as long as a sig meets file size limit it's ok, it's not tasking the server any more than a non-animated sig.

we just need to make sure there aren't the asses that make super-flash seizure-inducing ones, and we'll be fine

They can't be annoying, that's all I have to say.

Sorry but i think the law has been laid down. just accept it..

ok post your opinions in the polls please, so i can show the poll to the admin

yes i know, but, whats so bad about animations, if theyre not annoying?

I dont mind animations, but I highly doubt this will change.

I only mind them when they are annoying and are horse pr0n.

geee.... umm.... wrong section. :move:

I don't know how many times people have pressed for changes in Signature/Avatar rules, and they always end up inconclusive. I highly doubt that they will change.

The Rules clearly state no animations.
This Rule was put into place by Grenadiac.
No means no; deal with it.

With the people willing to accept this "new" rule, there will always be the people who will only read the first part of the sentence. "Animated signatures are allowed." 'Sweet! I can go upload my 5 gigabyte

There is no such thing as an animation that is not annoying, so get that out of your heads.

Even if it's a scrolling gradient, it's moving. When I'm reading text, the slightest movement on the page catches my eye and I can't concentrate as much as I normally could. That's annoying.