I would have changed mine regardless of whether MoDFox's comment had taken place here or any other thread. I don't view my avatar as reflecting my attitude, I think of it as something I find as amusing or interesting.JacksonCougAr wrote:Its worthwhile to note there has been 2 avatar changed because of this thread.
Your avatar defines you: For you and for others.
- shadowkhas
- Posts: 5423
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 8:00 am
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
![]() |
![]() |
(7:15:27 PM) Xenon7: I BRUK THE FIRST PAGE OMGOMGOMG RONALD REGAN
- JacksonCougAr
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 1:56 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
![]() |
- shadowkhas
- Posts: 5423
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 8:00 am
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
![]() |
![]() |
Honestly why debate something that has no real meaning... I mean I love the Internet as much as the next guy... but discussing the matter of how my avatar may or may not effect how people view my post... just seems... pointless.shadowkhas wrote:A debate has been provided. Points opposing your own have been shown, points with merit.

Not removing this 'till I get back. Leaving on [01/05/09]
- JacksonCougAr
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 1:56 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
![]() |
Do Avatars have any correlation to oneself? Perhaps. But I wouldn't use an image on a forums to base how someone's personality is. Should I assume that your personality could be in the same field as a constipated looking Chihuahua/Gremlin hybrid thing? Should All my posts be read differently because I have an "OBEY" Avatar? If so, How so? There's nothing to debate, to be honest. If you think an Avatar could be some kind of generalization about the poster, then something's twisted.

- CabooseJr
- Posts: 4592
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 8:09 am
- Location: Valve knows a lot about my cookies.
- Contact:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Meh, I change my avatar about every week, though my theme will always be the same.

© Newest AudioSurf Run = Miku Hatsune - Black★Rock Shooter(AudioSurf)
Newest YouTube Video= Portal: Project Beta(Small Promo)
You're using selective logic. You're saying "Well, I can't account for those cases, so you can't bring them up." Did you ever consider that when the vast majority of your readers consider you to be completely wrong and arrogant with your claims about this matter, that maybe they're on to something?JacksonCougAr wrote:God damn this isn't generic avatars I speak of: read page one before you shoot your mouth off >_<

Get over yourself. It's a gross overgeneralization and to categorize it as any legitimate discussion topic with any validity, whilst having no evidence whatsoever, is, as previously mentioned, arrogant. You think you are right and you just keep rambling with the same thing over and over when you're confronted about it. I hope you know that you successfully started a discussion that immediately went down the drain and now has no chance of resurrecting itself and will only continue to serve as a nonsensical argument until finally someone says something that crosses a line.
- JacksonCougAr
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 1:56 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
![]() |
- shadowkhas
- Posts: 5423
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 8:00 am
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
![]() |
![]() |
Well then I'm sorry, but you didn't make your case clear. I wanted to see where you were going with this, but alright then.JacksonCougAr wrote:Sigh: I hate you all: Its because of your avatars. Kthxbye.
Seriously... I was stating an idea and everyone so far is taking it in contexts I did not mean. Those who got it got it, those who didn't...well... chances are they still 'got' it, excuse the pun.
(7:15:27 PM) Xenon7: I BRUK THE FIRST PAGE OMGOMGOMG RONALD REGAN
- JacksonCougAr
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 1:56 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
![]() |
It's very simple really: you just cannot over-analyze it.
The image in your avatar, if it contains an expression, or feeling in it (usually in the form of a face) it can subconsciously affect the readers perception on your tone of voice. The tone of voice I speak of is the tone in which we read the text, our minds put that there, not some magic Internet god.
Thats the easiest part of this to grasp: the other part is the affect of your avatar on yourself.
You may eventually start to think in a similar manor to you avatar if you often re-read your own posts. Again, subconsciously taking on the personality of your avatar.
The image in your avatar, if it contains an expression, or feeling in it (usually in the form of a face) it can subconsciously affect the readers perception on your tone of voice. The tone of voice I speak of is the tone in which we read the text, our minds put that there, not some magic Internet god.
Thats the easiest part of this to grasp: the other part is the affect of your avatar on yourself.
You may eventually start to think in a similar manor to you avatar if you often re-read your own posts. Again, subconsciously taking on the personality of your avatar.
Provide evidence then.
There is absolutely nothing to support either of those ideas.
You're just saying it, and that's good for you. There is nothing to discuss because you cannot argue either way, because neither side haeyo6b=[267[05y8be5q0y3cyhb-9q'3549yuqp3hn49gqp3ohgq34pyochq3089y
The tone of the damn text conveys a hell of a lot more than the damn avatar. You type what you want to say, and that is what is conveyed. Your avatar does not contain a message, it barely contains an emotion. If people are utilizing an avatar as a means to read a post then they are stupid.
Christ this whole argument is idiotic.
There is absolutely nothing to support either of those ideas.
You're just saying it, and that's good for you. There is nothing to discuss because you cannot argue either way, because neither side haeyo6b=[267[05y8be5q0y3cyhb-9q'3549yuqp3hn49gqp3ohgq34pyochq3089y
The tone of the damn text conveys a hell of a lot more than the damn avatar. You type what you want to say, and that is what is conveyed. Your avatar does not contain a message, it barely contains an emotion. If people are utilizing an avatar as a means to read a post then they are stupid.
Christ this whole argument is idiotic.
- JacksonCougAr
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 1:56 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
![]() |
Ugh: either you agree or you don't, its not like I can reach into your mind and go: aha! you misjudged Tural because he has a cat avatar, or you thought Shadowkhas was a rapist because of his avatar... 
Page 1 of 4 [78 posts]

Page 1 of 4 [78 posts]
Last edited by JacksonCougAr on Thu May 01, 2008 9:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- JacksonCougAr
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 1:56 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
![]() |